Thread: Solar power
View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 03:09 PM   #294 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,746

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
Afaik, nukes can go to + 100% rated, but I don't offhand know the length of time at that output, might be generator heat dissipation limited. Do know TMI ran periodically 105 to 107 per Scientific American on their investigation. Ditto for Chernobyl. ( hmmm trend?) However every so often you need to refuel. Also know Stanford lab at Lawrence Livermore in Sacto has some that are 40+ years operation, same for the one here in reno that just got refueled.

Point is: they don't run 100 years and you DON'T do that hot.
There are nukes that have been in operation for 55 years now, and it seems they usually get extended service authorization in 20 year increments whenever they reach the end of permission to operate.

The reason nukes have an actual output of 95% is due to maintenance and refueling that brings them offline briefly, whereas all solar goes offline at least half of the time, and spends 99.99% of the rest of it at varying degrees of less than maximum output capability.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote