View Single Post
Old 11-23-2024, 04:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,925
Thanks: 8,209
Thanked 8,984 Times in 7,421 Posts
Quote:
Forgot to mention that for those building new, they now have a more efficient R-15 insulation and a R-21 for walls. If building new, just go with the air sealing and the new thicker insulation in the walls for a super efficient home from the start.
If you're building new, not retrofitting, nothing trumps geometry. a quasi-spherical shape will suck less heat (or coolth) out of the interior. The only house ever built to my design was in 1980.



When the wind was blowing 100MPH at the Oregon coast, inside it was as quiet as a Mercedes at the same speed. All you could hear was raindrops hitting the window panes.

My brother let himself in after it had sat vacant for two weeks and reported it was still at room temperature.

When the wind was out of the NW that upper deck was in a stagnation point. The greenhouse to the east is a boat tail to the prevailing winds..

If it is a retrofit, consider adding a greenhouse on the windward [or leeward] side.


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3e/6f...72a95156c0.jpg

Octahedral geometry for a quarter-sphere.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

________________
.
.
Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
  Reply With Quote