View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 04:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Quote:
Forgot to mention that for those building new, they now have a more efficient R-15 insulation and a R-21 for walls. If building new, just go with the air sealing and the new thicker insulation in the walls for a super efficient home from the start.
If you're building new, not retrofitting, nothing trumps geometry. a quasi-spherical shape will suck less heat (or coolth) out of the interior. The only house ever built to my design was in 1980.



When the wind was blowing 100MPH at the Oregon coast, inside it was as quiet as a Mercedes at the same speed. All you could hear was raindrops hitting the window panes.

My brother let himself in after it had sat vacant for two weeks and reported it was still at room temperature.

When the wind was out of the NW that upper deck was in a stagnation point. The greenhouse to the east is a boat tail to the prevailing winds..

If it is a retrofit, consider adding a greenhouse on the windward [or leeward] side.


https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3e/6f...72a95156c0.jpg

Octahedral geometry for a quarter-sphere.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote