View Single Post
Old 12-11-2024, 07:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Larco
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 10

Audi A2 1.2 TDI - '01 Audi A2 3L

Toyota Supra Turbo - '88 Toyota Supra Turbo
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Usually aeromods are quite easily noticeable. If unwanted attention from police or traffic enforcement could lead you into trouble, be careful about how extreme you would be willing to try aeromods...
I was not specific enough.
I meant to say if the suggested aeromods would give a large enough FC improvement be noticeable at the pump?

Is I understand all the aero accounts for only about 3-11% of the total consumption in normal urban-highway situation. Then the improvements made would be fractions of 11% at most?

I found this on the web for the XL7 2002 model:
Drag coefficient (Cd, Cx, Cw) 0.5
Frontal area (A) 2.66 m2 (est.)
Aerodynamic coefficient (Cd×A) 1.33 m2 (est.)
Aerodynamic resistance at 100 km/h (62 mph) 33.1 kW (est.)

Cd is quite bad at 0.5.... tough...
__________________
Best regards, Andreas

Audi A2 1.2 TDI '01 | Suzuki Grand Vitara "pending buy"
| Toyota Supra turbo '88 | Toyota Celica GT-four '89
  Reply With Quote