What part of my request for definative proof is missing such that you do not understand the request?
You tube copypaste posting is not a legitimate answer, nor is someone elses one off "scientific" report.
I have accepted an increase of compression because the gaps were full of some sort of unknown compound. What do the bearing / wear faces look like? We dont know. How about plating the cylinder wear tapers or even the piston skirt? Once again we dont know what in the cylinder is altered. I have technical books from as far back as 1950 up to 2013 stating compression is not a reliable single indicator of engine condition.
Can you even properly reply to C Sagans request for extrodinary proof?
Does that Hurt your feelings? Poor baby. Not my friend anymore? BTDTMODCA, take a number.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|