Quote:
Originally Posted by Logic
This...
This here did my head in.
(Which is why I haven't been back to thread in so long. I dont think I was capable of a coherent reply at the time of reading this)
I get that you don't know me.
Perhaps I AM some naked savage who dances around 3 legged pots filled with humans I'm boiling alive when not online.
Perhaps I get some sort of warped kick out of convincing people, who may never even report back, into wrecking their engines.
What I don't get is how all the linked Peer Reviewed, published Research, and feedback from people who tried this, can be so utterly ignored as to even entertain such a notion!???
Even results that show improvement in real working engines! One eg:
https://sci-hub.ru/10.1080/10402004.2014.909549
This one comment broke may faith in humans, being decent, thinking, inquisitive beings on average. 
Thx for that. Hope you get a real big kick out of knowing it.
Whatever.
I will continue to learn new and try new stuff based on new discoveries, that you and your ilk so blissfully ignore and reject, as that still seems brings me some happiness.
I will also continue to help people here by treating their engines, saving them money. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We've looked at this already and it went down in flames due to it's 'context'.
It has absolutely no bearing on 'the real world.'
It appears that you are absolutely incapable of sharing data that isn't related to 'SEVERE' , 'EXTREME' engine operating conditions, having no actionable information for people operating automobiles ( like BORPower additive users ), not gen-sets at 7%-load, at very low RPM, at very low temperature.
When you offer us a buffet of BS, it's quite easy to reject it. It's the only 'logical' outcome.