Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
What part of my request for definative proof is missing such that you do not understand the request?
You tube copypaste posting is not a legitimate answer, nor is someone elses one off "scientific" report.
I have accepted an increase of compression because the gaps were full of some sort of unknown compound. What do the bearing / wear faces look like? We dont know. How about plating the cylinder wear tapers or even the piston skirt? Once again we dont know what in the cylinder is altered. I have technical books from as far back as 1950 up to 2013 stating compression is not a reliable single indicator of engine condition.
Can you even properly reply to C Sagans request for extrodinary proof?
Does that Hurt your feelings? Poor baby. Not my friend anymore? BTDTMODCA, take a number.
|
The Peer review and publishing Process:
Harvard medical for eg. writes a paper.
Before they can publish it, it gets sent off to Stanford, Oxford, Yale, Johns Hopkins etc for Peer review.
If the paper is controversial, as in claims to have for eg. found a cure for cancer, the other universities will replicate the study to see if they get the same results.
Only if they do and give 'The Nod' to a study, is it white-balled and allowed to be published.
If you reject this process:
Go flush any and all the medication in your possession that you and yours take, immediately!
I'll wait ..............................
Have you done so?
If not; Why not?
So... you do accept Peer Reviewed, Published Research?
Therefore it seems; YOU choose to not accept or accept the linked research proving everything that is proven so far as it suits you.
So you don't want me to play by The Rules, you want me to play by YOUR rules...
Sorry, go find a moron to play with.
"What part.." I'll spell it out for you:
The part where you reject any definitive proof and demand I go get more for you to reject, etc-etc.
You know, the typical; ruck afound and waste the persons time tactic? That part!
So here's my demand:
You go prove it doesn't work.
When you come back and say so; I'll reject your claim and demand more definitive proof. ok..???
MY rules are as good as yours....
But I think I get your problem:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post697028
I say "bugger all this high pressure bottling! Pipe it up and put it through a (modded) diesel genset if that's all you have"
Meaning; put it through a fuel cell immediately and transport it as electricity.
(If you haven't got a fuel cell use a
modded genset)
That solves all your embrittlement and storage 'road blocks' with one simple/clever idea, making you look stupid.
And you don't like that do you!?
DON'T try BA ever!
It's was brought up in the 1st place as a means to help decent people...
There's the door.