Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
I like this a lot.
|
I can see the appeal, but for me it is close.
I would have rather seen a more upright grille and windscreen and more graceful rear taper that might allow for air attachment.
At a more intellectual level, the disingenuous front engine rear drive looking car was actually rear engine and mid-engined.
We were taught to avoid such things in architecture school, but architecture/building is still the more abused profession and full of folly, misdirection and fakery.
At least this car is cute, and I would own it at the right price.