Quote:
Originally Posted by Logic
IF
None of the tests done on BA counted
THEN
None of those same tests counrted for any other additive
THEREFORE
None of those things have any more right to be in oil than BA has.
That's logical deduction.
It does not get to be 'switched off' when it suits you or because you're too old to fit new stuff in your brain My Friend...
Oh and btw:
There are 2 oil certification 'clubs'.
The 2nd costs 150 000 $ annually to be a member of.
So most oil manufacturers forgo being members of that 'club' because it would make their oils so expensive no one would buy them anyway.
So by yet another tiny bit of deductive thinking; at least half of the acronyms you stated with 'your great authority' do not apply to the oils in the engines of people on this forum.
Perhaps, as the Oil Savior of Ecomodder, you might spend the time explaining the origins and meaning of all of them to all us stupid, ignorant, mere mortals, stuck so far below your great and authoritative intellect!
You know; that same intellect unable to format posts or even put links in them...
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All I can recommend is that you, very slowly, re-read everything Dr. Erdemir ever reported on the 'boron' research, and see if you can finally discern all the 'conditions', 'caveats' mentioned in his text, which illustrated the 'incompleteness' of their 'screening-out-process' testing, and how 'boron' was never 'proved' to be efficacious in a commercially-mass-produced automobile engine under 'non-extreme-tribological condition' operation; unlike 'all' commercially accepted additive packages 'which were'.
What you need to know is hiding in plain view! Always has been.
Your deduction is illogical.