--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) BA is not a 'lubricant', the 'lubricant' is the motor oil.
2) BA is an alleged 'friction modifier' ( FM )
3) My 'experience' with BA in oil is as 'vast' at that of the tribologists who've reported on it, and the 'context' regarding the conditions under which they 'experienced' it.
Not what appears to be some cherry-picked, desperate attempt to 'save the hypothesis at all cost', which will likely strip you of any credibility you might have ever had.
Perhaps unlike yourself, I don't need to go the the Sun to find out that I'd perish in the process.
I can 'satisfactorily know' the probable outcome from an 'academic' standpoint.
The 'data' you presented us in defense of your hypothesis seems to support the opposite of what you argue. If you thought you were 'sitting' on a factual six-legged stool, the data have seemed to have already kicked about five of them away.
And it would probably take someone, familiar with the life's work of the late, Dr. Oliver Sacks to explain it; and then, that probably wouldn't be sufficient to alter your hallucination, since they probably hadn't been to the Sun either.
It's been fun to watch you both defend and attack education in the same breath. Bizarre.
But hey, keep going with that massive IQ of yours , there's still time to produce some overwhelmingly-convincing evidence that 'll devastate the village idiot from Texas Tech.
