Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
But that seems to go back to the original question. The observed readings were identical for both tests.
Do you think that, based on the size of the leak + the accuracy of the readings yielded an accidental co-inky-dink of identical readings?
CarloSW2
|
I think that the leak was small enough that it wouldn't have an effect on the readings. Unfortunately it was big enough for them to detect it and use it as an excuse to fail the car.