Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03
It's Floworks - a part of the Solidworks suite (yay College  ) - it's actually doing a 3D analysis, but I'm restricting it to a thin area. |
Very cool. Any way to get this program legally? Without being a graphic arts/CAD major?
Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03
While it may seem I'm putting a lot of time, really, I'm setting up a model and hitting run before I go to bed. The model took me about 15 minutes to build off a photograph and then another 5 minutes to setup the CFD suite.
|
Good to know someone is getting sleep around here...
Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03
Theory vs. physical is a valid point... You can have a sound theory, but physical application doesn't work... But, to waste cycles on building something that doesn't work on the theoretical level is not something I'm interested in. Concept -> theory -> optimize -> compromise -> refine -> implement is more or less the linear flow I'm following. Besides, what's good enough to the auto mfr's, Lockheed, Siemens, Boeing, Airbus, Nasa, etc. etc. etc. is good enough for me - Analyze first, then build They didn't build the 787 before modeling and analyzing it  |
I prefer the OODA loop myself. Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. It is what fighter pilots use in their combat training. The great thing about it is can apply to almost anything.
Wiki it...
Please continue! MORE DATA. INPUT! MORE INPUT! - Johnny 5 of Short Circuit fame