View Single Post
Old 11-25-2008, 02:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
OK, then the Honda Insight I bought used for about $8500, and have averaged 70+ mpg over the 5 years I've had it, by not driving particularly slow. Or the CRX I had before that, that would do better than 40 mpg. Or even my long-gone Austin-Healey Sprite.

The point is that there's a lot more to be gained by changing the cars so they're more efficient, than from forcing everyone to drive slowly. And it's likely to be easier: you just spend some advertising money selling the idea of small, nimble, fun cars instead of oversized penis substitutes, instead of hiring bunches of traffic cops, with all the support apparatus.

And how much gas would be wasted by having all those extra traffic cops driving around in their Crown Vics all day?
Yes I totally agree with you there. Put all those Super Doodie drivin' leadfoots into Metros and they can keep their bad behavior- at least the damage will be less.
__________________


  Reply With Quote