Quote:
Originally Posted by MazdaMatt
Am i reading correctly? 1983, 200mpg?
Now... i'm no aeronaught, but isn't the body on backwards? Shouldn't the driver be facing the big round back?
|
True, and then their mpg figures would jump even higher... plus handling would be better (better to have 2 wheels in front and one in the back- if forgot what the name of that configuration was- i know one is tadpole but I get them confused all the time).