Thread: New Aptera
View Single Post
Old 12-29-2008, 04:35 PM   #21 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Cd -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
One of the things that strikes me as genius is the way that the car does not give up its aerodynamics, yet rides very high off of the ground.

This is not only great for safety,( from jacked up SUVs crashing into you ) but it also would help to make people that are used to SUVs ( a huge percentage of the American population ) more comfortable in the car.

Anyone else feel this way ?
Yes and no. I think that before the transition to FWD, the car was even *higher* off the ground. I don't think the previous ride-height was for "rider perception" concerns. From what I have read on other Ecomodder threads, this was probably done because an "airplane cigar body shape" performs better aerodynamically when it is higher off the ground.

From the latest pictures I am seeing, I think they lowered it. This implies to me that they compromised in the name of increased safety, i.e. lower Cd in the name of lower COG (Center Of Gravity). From my POV, these are the "trade-offs" that good engineers make.

Can someone prove/disprove my perception that the current Aptera design is now lower?

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote