View Single Post
Old 01-17-2009, 12:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Big Dave
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Thermoelectric cooling is very inefficient. COP of 0.4 or so.Your Rankine cycle AC is very efficient. COP of 3.0 routinely.

I have batted around the idea of using an adsoption machine for car AC. It would run off the exhaust and/or jacket water heat. Adsorption is also very inefficient (COP of 0.8 vs COP of 3.0 for Rankine cooling) but it has the virtue of being able to work OK with a very low temp heat input. Solar adsorption machines work A-OK with only 200 degree input heat. My thermstat is 203 degrees and my EGT (post turbo is in the 300 degree range.

Problem is that it is worthless until the vehicle gets warmed up enough to put out the requisite temps. So you have to retain the Rankine cycle unit. Also we now need ANOTHER condenser and it needs to be four times the size of the Rankine cycle condenser.

Doable, but a engineering problem.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote