View Single Post
Old 01-25-2009, 04:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Deezler
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 261

Bio Deezler (sold) - '03 Volkswagen Jetta GLS TDI
90 day: 50.78 mpg (US)

The Beast. - '03 GMC Sierra 2500HD SLT
90 day: 12.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 22 Posts
Aerohead, this would be adding another power stroke. The steam exhaust stroke would consume far less energy than the expansion stroke, and the frictional losses should be less than what's added as well. You might need to run a higher rpm to get the same power output though, to offset the reduction in frequency of gasoline power strokes. But then your frictional losses have gone up also... wait a minute, this idea keeps getting worse.

I can't see this approach ever coming into mass production. The steam washes all the oil off the bores as someone already mentioned, and adds water dilution to the crankcase oil. You would end up with increased oil consumption and change intervals. I can't imagine the piston rings would like running on un-oiled cylinder bores either.
  Reply With Quote