View Single Post
Old 02-08-2008, 07:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
cfg83
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
Peter7307 -

I don't know, it looks like the best (almost ) real-world MPG car out there is a 3-wheeler :

Video: (definitely worth checking) test drive of Aptera @ Popular Mechanics
http://forum.ecomodder.com/showthrea...376.html?t=376

For me, this would be the ideal "super-commuter" for people (like me) that have terrible commutes.

The one thing I don't like is that the Tri-Hawk was only rated at 28 MPG in 1982. I thought that because of the 1.2 liter engine, it would at least have more get-up and go, but it *seems* to only have a ~10 second 0-60, based on the car magazine tests. Is a 10 second 0-60 really fast in 1982? It used a carburator and had no emissions equipment because it was classified as a motorcycle (right?). In 1982 it was around $14000+. The Aptera is about $30000, so I think they are in the same price bracket (i.e. pricey to say the least). In 1984 you could get a Honda CRX with better MPG for around $6000, so I think the Tri-Hawk would have needed a lot more tuning to make it competitive in terms of MPG.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote