View Single Post
Old 03-10-2009, 09:26 AM   #17 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Thanks John! (I'm not at my own computer)

As for the rest of it, I have come to the conclusion that this job doesn't pay enough. I have read and re-read several texts on vehicle aerodynamics. I have worked in vehicle design in industry. I have gotten all the aero training pilots get too. I have been to an SAE aero seminar and still have the coursework. I researched and composed an internal paper on aero for my former employer. I have toured several wind tunnels and spoke with the operators. I am not a professional aerodynamicist but I think I know more about it than the average bear. Not saying I couldn't ever be wrong, but...

Bottom line is, put forth the effort to find an authorative text and try to understand it. It's a bit much to cover piecemeal in a forum. THEN discussions about aero are less likely to be like discussions on religion and politics- more facts (or at least proven theories), less opinions.

I Googled but did not find online backup for my assertion that a behind-the-grille block is virtually no less aero than a before-the-grille block. As aerohead alluded to in post 4, a stagnant bubble forms then blah blah blah.

Same goes for parachute aero. If a parachute had a giant automobile shape behind it, well let's just say I would not want to be dangling from it. It is the aftbody influence...

Peace out.

Last edited by Frank Lee; 03-10-2009 at 09:35 AM..
  Reply With Quote