View Single Post
Old 04-14-2009, 11:40 PM   #22 (permalink)
DaveBirkenstock
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
So, Dave - Could one vent the low pressure area along the forward mid-line surface to the aft cone area, such that would aide the vacuum effect stated as necessary to maintain proper flow and create said positive thrust, without spoiling the flow in the forward mid-line area which creates said low pressure area?

What effect would that pressure differential have on the necessity to provide additional vacuum to the rearward area of the shape in order to maintain proper flow?
It's an interesting thought... I remember reading of an airfoil that used this approach to minimize transonic shockwaves.

IIRC, the suction inlet velocity for the 'after' image was over 78 MPH while the car was at 60 MPH, so I'm not sure you could get enough suction pressure & volume.

Plus, as you wrote, changing the low pressure area might disrupt things downstream too much to get the powered pressure recovery.
  Reply With Quote