11-24-2024, 05:20 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Vermont
Posts: 98
Thanks: 34
Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
|
'96 Silverado vs 2009 Outback
I live in a world of hills. Going downhill idling, the Silverado picks up speed very quickly. The Subaru noticeably less so on the same routes. The Silverado bleeds off speed more slowly going back uphill.
The Subaru has all wheel drive. The Silverado has manual electrically engaged 4 wheel drive.
I'm guessing this is the explanation?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-24-2024, 07:20 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Vermont
Posts: 98
Thanks: 34
Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
|
Couple other thoughts re coasting:
1.) At least with a wheelbarrow, big wheels push easier than little ones.
2.) Wheel inertia, disparaged under power, especially when needing to frequently brake, is not necessarily such a detriment when largely coasting up and down hills in our area.
Particularly if the wheels are storing energy by retarding speed which might be wasted in braking at curves, where speed buildup downhill otherwise would get excessive with small light wheels.
Last edited by vteco; 11-24-2024 at 07:34 PM..
|
|
|
11-24-2024, 07:26 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Vermont
Posts: 98
Thanks: 34
Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
|
Third thought. Everybody has different conditions. If I lived in a desert, or a city, or had a long commute, every aspect of working towards reducing fuel usage might be different. I'm shooting towards optimizing a very particular niche set of conditions in a specific vehicle.
|
|
|
11-26-2024, 12:17 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
|
Wheel inertia tends to be troublesome for overall efficiency, even if it could seem at a first glance to be beneficial while driving through hilly terrain. Fewer usage of the brake OTOH tends to happen once you're already driving in a more efficient way.
|
|
|
11-26-2024, 11:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Vermont
Posts: 98
Thanks: 34
Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
|
Well having read through the 100+ tips here I can say truthfully that I am already driving that way, nothing seemed new, and particularly I've been maximizing since the Subaru has instantaneous and trip average MPG readout which I've paid careful attention to for the last 6 months.
Nevertheless, the Subaru, just tested a half hour ago on a 10 mile round trip down the mountain and back, will slow down with the foot off the pedal on even a moderately steep downhill grade. I'm thinking this must have something to do with the "all-wheel drive" being computer apportioned somehow during coast.
The Silverado easily and rapidly accelerates on practically any downhill grade, pedal off. While it has 4 wheel drive, it's only when manually engaged.
This is a separate issue than wheel inertia.
I think it's not established that "wheel inertia tends to be troublesome for overall efficiency" in my own case since that overall efficiency is composed primarily of winding hill conditions, with little highway usage.
I'm going to guess that:
80% of my driving is up and down winding mountain roads at 35-45 mph speed limits
12% hilly town streets, 25 mph speed limit
5% hilly 55 mph highway speed limit
3% hilly 65 mph highway speed limit
These conditions probably have their own set of optimization scenarios. That's what I'm interested in. I think that will take an open mind to work out.
Last edited by vteco; 11-26-2024 at 07:25 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vteco For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2024, 12:50 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
wheel inertia
Quote:
Originally Posted by vteco
Well having read through the 100+ tips here I can say truthfully that I am already driving that way, nothing seemed new, and particularly I've been maximizing since the Subaru has instantaneous and trip average MPG readout which I've paid careful attention to for the last 6 months.
Nevertheless, the Subaru, just tested a half hour ago on a 10 mile round trip down the mountain and back, will slow down with the foot off the pedal on even a moderately steep downhill grade. I'm thinking this must have something to do with the "all-wheel drive" being computer apportioned somehow during coast.
The Silverado easily and rapidly accelerates on practically any downhill grade, pedal off. While it has 4 wheel drive, it's only when manually engaged.
This is a separate issue than wheel inertia.
I think it's not established that "wheel inertia tends to be troublesome for overall efficiency" in my own case since that overall efficiency is composed primarily of winding hill conditions, with little highway usage.
I'm going to guess that:
80% of my driving is up and down winding mountain roads at 35-45 mph speed limits
12% hilly town streets, 25 mph speed limit
5% hilly 55 mph highway speed limit
3% hilly 65 mph highway speed limit
These conditions probably have their own set of optimization scenarios. That's what I'm interested in. I think that will take an open mind to work out.
|
The wheel inertia is only experienced during acceleration, or deceleration.
On cruise control, at a constant velocity, the wheel/tires are just flywheels, storing kinetic energy.
On a hybrid or EV, a propensity to overspeed on a downhill during cruise control, up to 81.1% of the 'braking energy' lost to maintain speed would be recovered to the battery by regeneration.
On the Chevy, if you brake to maintain constant speed, you just lose all that energy to brake heat.
In my Morris Minor 100, Rambler American, 40-hp Karmann-Ghia, and 60-hp CRX, I would just let the car accelerate on the downhill, to assist the 'climb' on the next grade.
Chrysler Corp. used this in their 'momentum' driving ( now referred to as 'hypermiling' ) to win the annual Mobil Economy Run.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-16-2024, 02:19 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,687
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,922 Times in 7,365 Posts
|
What year and model was the Rambler? In college I had a 1959 station wagon.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
Yesterday, 11:13 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Vermont
Posts: 98
Thanks: 34
Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
|
aerohead, Luckily for me my winding downhill drive to town is really a set of up and downs plus curves which mean I rarely have to brake in the Silverado when coasting. The changes tend to keep it in range of the speed limit. This is all 35-45 mph posted.
The Subaru on the other hand has to be driven on the same route because it just has too much rolling resistance. I don't know why.
These winter days I'm getting 18 mpg average with the Silverado and 22.5 mpg with the Subaru.
When I bought the Silverado the seller said it got 15 mpg. Since then I've replaced many components, including wheel hubs, and am using lower visc synthetic oil. And my driving habits are much improved. Aero mods are coming. PCM programming is coming.
I'm going to try to catch the Subaru's mileage figure, as a first goal.
|
|
|
|