Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2012, 02:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
Possible 6% mpg gain from adding a cone filter...Ford Focus...

Looks like maybe a 2 mpg (6%) gain from just adding a cone filter. I've had this filter laying around for a few years from another car....didn't think it would help since I already had the restrictive cold air intake nozzle removed from the pipe going to the front...and also the resonator box was removed allowing air from under the hood into the filter box.

IAT is probably close to the same as before...around 10F higher at 70F...3-4F higher at 90F vs ambient....so it's not likely a warm air issue.

Took 1/2 tank or so for the ECU to adjust.

Filter is laying on a piece of foam....OD of intake pipe and the filter pipe are the same...thus the tape and clamp. Just clears the hood.


__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-01-2012, 02:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I am glad you put "possible" in the title.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-03-2012)
Old 07-01-2012, 02:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
My mistake. I meant GUARANTEED.
__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 04:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154

Whitey - '10 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 33.74 mpg (US)

Hershey - '13 Nissan Altima SL
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Midas - '10 Toyota Prius two
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
I once owned a Pontiac Vibe GT, aka Toyota Matrix (rebadged!). When I was younger I installed a K&N cold air intake full air system. I did see a noticeable jump in FE along with POWER, which younger me was all about. A few months later at an autozone I was bored and looked in the K&N book hanging off a chain and they were claiming a 15hp boost. I never tested the claim with anything more sophisticated than the seam of my pants. I do know smaller cars are choked by the EPA, my buddy got a intake system for his Ranger's 3L V6 and didn't see much difference.
__________________


Check out my facebook page, if you feel like watching my progress.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MPGran...007268?sk=wall

Last edited by MPGranger; 07-01-2012 at 04:28 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 04:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
HydroJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 625

Aerofocus (retired) - '00 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 44.66 mpg (US)

The Red Baron (sold) - '93 Geo Metro
90 day: 44.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 156 Times in 103 Posts
Please do more testing because if this is true, I'll have to install one of these on my focus.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 05:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Noticed a similar increase on my intrepid when made they switch 6 years ago. I assumed the engine had slightly less vaccum under acceleration, maybe adding a little torque.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 06:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by suspectnumber961 View Post
Looks like maybe a 2 mpg (6%) gain from just adding a cone filter. I've had this filter laying around for a few years from another car....didn't think it would help since I already had the restrictive cold air intake nozzle removed from the pipe going to the front...and also the resonator box was removed allowing air from under the hood into the filter box.
What caused the improvement? Removing the cold air inlet? Removing the resonator? Changing from a probably dirty filter to a likely clean filter? A combination of all 3 actions? What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by suspectnumber961 View Post
IAT is probably close to the same as before...around 10F higher at 70F...3-4F higher at 90F vs ambient....so it's not likely a warm air issue.
So.... in other words, you don't know whether IAT has changed.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-03-2012)
Old 07-01-2012, 06:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by suspectnumber961 View Post
My mistake. I meant GUARANTEED.
this is a CROCK O POOH
the EPA IATn BITOG AutoSpeed have all performed A B testing with various
"alleged performance" air filters including K & N
none of them (the tested filters) increase flow or fuel economy in any way at all at cruise
above a stock air filter

and the testing also shows that the K & N air filters do not actually "filter" the incoming air as well as stock OEM air filters

as you know the MAF sensor only samples a small percentage of the entire air flow and if the flow at the sample area is disturbed or re routed by tampering with the air box assembly then ....

your POS cone air filter very likely is not directing air flow to the MAF sensor correctly (as designed) and because of that the MAF is under reporting
this results in changes in the way the ECM assigns values to many thing
including spark timing and injector pulse width

you can test my theory by providing long term fuel trim with calculated load and MAF flow values and ign timing values at 55 mph on the same stretch of highway with your new POS filter and the original OEM filter

any generic OBD2 scan tool that can show real time live data can perform this task.

until then
this should be relegated to the UNICORN thread as it is bogus .
imho

Last edited by mwebb; 07-01-2012 at 06:41 PM.. Reason: MAF sample
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mwebb For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-03-2012), Dawie (07-08-2012), Frank Lee (07-01-2012), TEiN (07-04-2012)
Old 07-01-2012, 07:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
The K&N filter may do one thing. It may increase max hp. It will do nothing mileage wise for any vehicle with a throttle, since any increase in flow will simply mean that you will close the throttle a little to compensate.

This really ain't rocket surgery.

I think that a low restriction air filter might make a bit of a difference on a diesel as it will lower pumping losses.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pete c For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-03-2012), mcrews (07-02-2012)
Old 07-01-2012, 07:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
We have been down this road 1000 times already. Unicorn.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-03-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com