10-09-2010, 03:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,364 Times in 4,764 Posts
|
Reynolds number calculation
Reynolds number has to do with a bodies size in relation to its velocity,moving through a viscous fluid and boundary layer conditions,whether the boundary layer is laminar or turbulent is dependent upon it.
The number is named after Osborne Reynolds who introduced it in 1882.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For road vehicle work the Reynolds number is defined by:
Length X Velocity / Kinematic viscosity
L X V / v
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinematic viscosity is the 'coefficient of viscosity',also 'absolute viscosity',also 'dynamic viscosity',and also just 'viscosity', divided by density,or
viscosity / density ( Mu over Rho )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE: Toyota Prius,approx. 14-foot length,at 60-mph ( 88 feet per second ),on a 50-degree F day,( v = 0.00015 ft-squared/second )
Then,--------------- 14 X 88/ 0.00015 = 8,213,333 = Reynolds number
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinematic viscosity can be found in tables.You can directly measure your vehicles length,and you just pick a velocity in feet per second.
P.S. v at standard temp and pressure is 0.000158.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Knowing the Reynolds number allows calculation of surface-friction drag,or the 'skin-friction' component of your vehicles profile drag.Subtracting the skin friction component from the profile drag reveals the 'pressure drag' of your vehicle which is governed by flow separation.A perfectly streamlined vehicle will have zero pressure drag and only a bit of skin friction which is unavoidable to the viscous qualities of the air.
Last edited by aerohead; 10-14-2010 at 05:52 PM..
Reason: transposed wrong number
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-09-2010, 09:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
.... Kinematic viscosity is the 'coefficient of viscosity',also 'absolute viscosity',also 'dynamic viscosity',and also just 'viscosity'....
|
If you're working with these equations, it will make a difference on whether you use absolute or kinematic viscosity.
The units for absolute viscosity are quite a bit different than kinematic viscosity.
Jim.
|
|
|
10-10-2010, 10:09 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
|
20,000,000 seems awfully high. From memory (it's been a long time . . .) the rule of thumb for Reynolds number at STP was 10,000 X MPH X length in feet, which would yield 10K X 60 X 14 = 8,400,000. This seems more reasonable to me.
|
|
|
10-13-2010, 06:11 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,364 Times in 4,764 Posts
|
difference
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3-Wheeler
If you're working with these equations, it will make a difference on whether you use absolute or kinematic viscosity.
The units for absolute viscosity are quite a bit different than kinematic viscosity.
Jim.
|
Jim,yes it absolutely critical that kinematic viscosity be used.
|
|
|
10-13-2010, 06:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,364 Times in 4,764 Posts
|
6380?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick
20,000,000 seems awfully high. From memory (it's been a long time . . .) the rule of thumb for Reynolds number at STP was 10,000 X MPH X length in feet, which would yield 10K X 60 X 14 = 8,400,000. This seems more reasonable to me.
|
Patrick,sometimes kinematic viscosity is given as it's reciprocal,which for standard air is 6380.
In my table of SI units kinematic viscosities listed have been multiplied by 10,000.
The formula I have for Reynolds number is also from Daugherty.Hucho uses the same equation.
|
|
|
10-14-2010, 06:02 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,364 Times in 4,764 Posts
|
goof and correction
In the Prius example I transposed the Reynolds number of a 35-foot moving van into the solution for the Prius.
Patrick caught the numerical mistake and the whole thing didn't register with me until last night.
I went back and edited the original thread where you will find a significantly lower value.
My 'math' is good enough now that I think I may be ready for Arthur Anderson,ENRON,or Moody's Investment Services.
I'll see if I can clean up the skin-friction thread.
|
|
|
02-16-2011, 06:42 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: belgium
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
reynold number calc
hi,
i want to calculate the Reynolds number of exhaust gas with a given temperature(°c) and massflow(g/s).
What is the fastest way?
thanks in advance
|
|
|
02-16-2011, 08:26 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
That's flow through a tube, which is a different calculation than the above equations for flow across a plate. Use this:
Re=D*V*rho/mu,
where D=dia, V=velocity, rho=density of exhaust gas, mu=viscosity.
The assumption that exhaust gas = air (rho=1.3kg/m^3 at STP) should get you within an order of magnitude.
|
|
|
02-16-2011, 07:44 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
One of the fun parts with that equation is that exhaust gas is HOT. And it cools relatively rapidly as it moves through the exhaust system. So its density changes by a decent amount...
-soD
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 03:57 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ON
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
While we're doing the math, what is the effect of temperature on skin friction and pressure drag. I'm thinking warm day vs cool day vs cold snap like we recently had.
(I should do it myself, but it's been so long I don't even know where to look for the numbers)
|
|
|
|