Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-17-2018, 10:41 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 678
Thanks: 20
Thanked 146 Times in 130 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Where would you find a 3-cylinder radial? I don't think I've ever seen a radial engine that wasn't for aircraft use,
Yeah. Anyway, see my permalink #9 above. The Revetec cam lobe engine may be a better idea.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-18-2018, 01:04 AM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Turning the power 90 degrees is not as efficient as gearing in the same axis.

Flatheads have far less efficient combustion chambers than OHV.

Lubricating downward pointing cylinders might get funky. Yes, radials are lubricated but with a simple sump and pump?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Daschicken (11-18-2018)
Old 11-18-2018, 02:02 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 678
Thanks: 20
Thanked 146 Times in 130 Posts
All true.

How abour the ReveTec idea?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2018, 08:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Can't get that either, right?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2018, 09:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 678
Thanks: 20
Thanked 146 Times in 130 Posts
Not Yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2018, 01:53 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel And The Wolf View Post
I've read that a radial engine (Radial, not rotary) is lighter and more powerful than an inline engine of the same cylinder number and displacement.What are the objections to a horizontally mounted three cylinder radial engine in place of the inline four the Prius comes with?
I can't see it being lighter than an inline 3 cylinder - comparing apples to apples.
OK, the crankshaft is a lot shorter, but ...

Needs 3 (double) camshafts & 3 mechanisms to drive those
Cylinder walls are not shared with the next cylinder
Needs 3 separate water jackets & piping
Needs 3 separate intake & exhaust headers
Needs longer fuel lines, wiring harness

On top, 3 cylinders in a radial pattern will take up much more space than 3 IL.

Radials are notorious for leaking oil

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
Xist (11-20-2018)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com