![]() |
.
.
|
Carbon Nanotubes are also purportedly stronger than steel in certain configurations, and have been considered as a sort of "space elevator" mechanism, by which objects could be hoisted into space via a machine that would scale a "rope" suspended by a satellite object.
I'll have to find a reference for that, I'm sure. |
Quote:
|
Ever heard the term "carbon based"?
I don't directly correlate transfer efficiency to carbon content, but all things in nature can be dated by their carbon content. All things currently known to be in existence (that I'm aware of) are carbon based. |
Rocks and rock formations can be carbon dated. Rocks were living at one point?
|
Carbon dating is just the most famous technique for checking the age of things. It does not have a very long range, geologically speaking.
Winfield, have you considered posting your query to a forum where people would be doing more than guessing? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's often beneficial to understand whether one is actually making guesses, or just being a smart ass. |
At the moment, I'm going to say hype. That was the point I was trying to make while being a smart ass. It's a "smoke and mirrors" science for now, because all of 100 people in the world *might* know anything about it, if the technology is anything more than toilet paper with scribbles on it to begin with.
I dunno about the fight, I don't watch fighting since I got out of it years ago. |
I've been starting to see carbon nanotubes and carbon "buckyballs" and such as hype, like the flying car. Pretty sure I've been reading little "won't it be cool when.....?" blurbs about these things for at least 20 years. Still don't have any in my hands.
Wake me when they've come to market. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com