![]() |
Aero trunk lid project
3 Attachment(s)
This idea comes from a response by aerohead to my spoiler tests (http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post242653). But I think it needs its own thread since it is not a "Bonneville" spoiler--or even a spoiler.
The current lid mod (see photo) lifts the trunk 2.75-3.0" and keeps or slightly increases its downslope. It extends a "lip" out to the bumper. It is sealed to the oncoming air with duct-tape on the read window and magnets on the sides of the body. It is ugly. Made of coroplast, reused cardboard, black duct tape, reused styrofoam, and a 1/8" steel support rod at the lip's edge to prevent wind from contorting the shape. If it has a good effect, I'll build a better one entirely of coroplast using this prototype's parts as a template for the cuts. I want to do my test differently than the ABA type. I have a 6 mile stretch of freeway on my regular commute. I want to use it as the test track, recording the data of my commute for a couple weeks. I'll record very carefully by setting up a video camera on a tripod in the former back seat area. The camera would record 7-8mins of video daily. What Ultra Gauge data would be of most interest? I'll put throttle position, trip g/h, MPH and trip ave MPH, InstaMPG and trip average MPG, trip distance. That's six, all the space I have on one window. Substitutions? BTW, the terrain has two sustained, significant half mile inclines. But I am practiced already at hitting steady throttle positions as I climb them. |
You do plan to tuft it right ?
Why not add a vertical 'spine' that meets up with the rear window? ( At the center of the car ) You could add tufts to it and get a better idea of where the airflow is going. ( Basically just a rectangular piece of coroplast / cardboard that would have one edge cut at an angle to meet up with the back window. Rather than taping the tufts, you could even poke holes in the thing and sew the yarn into it. This would keep the yarn from sticking to the tape or being affected by it ) Also, the edges of the sides look like they will cause considerable drag ( my guess ). Any plans on taping the sides flush with the car ( at the B-pillar ) |
Quote:
Quote:
( Basically just a rectangular piece of coroplast / cardboard that would have one edge cut at an angle to meet up with the back window. Quote:
Quote:
|
On Volvo sedans (S60/S80/S40 Mk.2), you can see the higher trunk line toe in as it gets further aft, reducing the wake area of the upper half of the car.
At the same time the higher trunk line reduces the apparent rear angle, so it'll match the streamlining template closer. |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I tested the below design (see pics) last night in a situation of low traffic but dropping ambient temps. My not-so-reliable results suggest a possible gain of .65mpg, or no gain at all, but no loss likely. I need to retest it, having learned not to test between 10pm and midnight. I found MetroMPG's old excellent tuft testing for his vortex generator experiment, and I plan to copy his spacing and length of tufts. I'll try and build this vertical tuft thing too, Cd. I'll take and post video. But first how might I improve the tapering, the trailing edge, and other drag contributors. I should curve the ends of the "lip"? |
tapering
Quote:
You'll see this on say the Honda Fit,as you stand behind the car to one side looking forward.Looking at the A,B,C,and D-pillars,you notice that each falls in towards the center of the Fit a little more than the one in front,the further back you go. It would put a little twist into the sides,reducing the plan form area of the top of the extending panel while maintaining the curve of the 'base' which is less affected by the downwash off the roof. |
the Fit has an impressive amount of taper. i notice it every time i'm behind one.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
tuft test 1
I should have done this earlier. Now I have, and I think what it tells me is that the angle of the rear window may not be all that bad for air flow. In the linked video, you will see what I think is mostly pretty good flow down the window. A little turbulent, maybe? But down low, in the center, you'll see tufts that are being sucked-up the windowpane. That movement was very consistent, at 40 as much as 65 mph. The bottom row of tufts would be under my trunk lid if it were attached. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLQeoV831aU
Thoughts anyone? |
I'm also working on the rear trunk area on my 96 civic hx it currently has a fastback flow thru design that makes it ideal for riding with the ac off windows down. there is no back window no trunk lid no trunk whatsoever, tailights have been relocated into the bumpercover. I'm pretty sure this might get some attention. would love to post pics but I'm hadicapped when it comes to computer prowess, tried to attached pic to this reply promt ask for url adress I'm lost there any help maybe?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com