Aeromodding in the 1930's: 38 mpg, 70 mph Model T
 

Radical aeromodding of the DIY variety (e.g. basjoos' Aerocivic) isn't a new pursuit. I learned this from a friend of mine, whose father - at the age of 17 in 1933 - redesigned & fabricated an aerodynamic body for his Ford Model T.

He transformed Ford's original high-drag disaster into a narrowed, boattailed, teardrop that was faster, more efficient and arguably better looking than the original.

And fortunately for posterity, he documented the transformation in photos:

• The end result was a custom car that would go 70 mph with its original engine. The Model T in stock form topped out around 45 mph.

• Fuel economy was similarly improved with the streamlined version. Harry reported achieving 38 mpg (US), vs. the original car's 25-30 mpg.

Harry's efficiency interests didn't stop with the aero Model T. In later years, he equipped an Oldsmobile with a basic fuel economy meter: a graduated glass cylinder (in the cabin) which fed fuel to the carburetor. He used it to monitor fuel consumption on the road.

Harry was also an early adopter of the original VW Beetle. Even then, he was aware of its missed potential: despite its relatively good fuel efficiency (for its time), his son Tom tells me he remembers Harry explaining that its poor aerodynamics held it back from even better MPG.

The guy was a true ecomodding pioneer.

---

For those who are interested, I posted the original version of this story on MetroMPG.com, where you can find more info than appears here.

I asked my friend Tom (Harry's son) why he didn't put fairings on the wheels - it seems like the most obvious oversight.


He asked his dad the same thing - and the answer is they were left off because there weren't many paved roads where he lived, and in the wet weather, the muck would have filled the fender wells and hardened to cement. (The "original" version of the car had its fenders removed too.)

He truly was a pioneer. He was building his car ahead of some of the more famous early aerodynamic cars:

http://metrompg.com/posts/photos/tat...-airflow-s.jpg

Tatra T77 (1934), Dymaxion car (1933), Chrysler Airflow (1934)

The 30's really did see an explosion in aerodynamic design investigation.

PS...

FYI, I've updated the original post with better pics & links to higher quality images.

Very cool :)

But it almost makes me sad to hear the orginal model T got 25-30mpg :/

That's an awesome project though :)

Isn't CAFE standards at 27.5mpg?

How far we've come...

I love it, I love It , I love it!

I'm building something along those lines, but in a torpedoe roadster style with a boatail body of bird's eye maple.
Something simple ....32 Chevrolet chassis....58 racing 3.5S Jaguar engine, hydraulic brakes, stainless roller bearing king pins for the original wheels....you will hear about it.....maybe a book. The name: Bois De Boulogne...please keep tuned. The chassis has been primed and the next step is mating the 5 speed tranny (with electric overdrive) to the Mazda pick-up differential. You see, I needed something with the original 6 wheel studs....with hydraulic braking power. Mazda not only had it, but would you believe exactly as the same width as the original Chevy rear diff?
As it will be used sparingly and for showing off my wooden box company, I don't feel guilty. Yet.
Frederick, pres. Wooden You Box It inc.

dont forget about all those weight penalties due to crash safety and stuff. and the fact that the model T couldnt drive on the highways, or start itself without a crank.

That's often mentioned when people lament the lack of progress in fuel economy, but then you have to ask yourself why we've obviously progessed so much in every category but fuel economy...The only real answer is that we've never tried to progress much anywhere else. CD players, ABS, heated steering wheels, but fuel economy? nah, :p

New CAFE is 35mpg by 2020

Just for future reference... The original model T weighed in at around 1200 pounds and the later year model T's with all steel construction weighed 1500lbs.... In any case, on a flat road, constant velocity - there's no weight penalty :/