![]() |
Brief Review: 2008 Dodge Avenger SXT, 4-Cylinder
Long story short, with the headwinds, it felt as if I was pushing a Ford LTD down the highway.
http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20148629-E.jpg 2008 Dodge Avenger SXT Engine: 2.4L, DOHC Inline-4, with Variable Valve Timing -- rated at 173 hp and 166 ft-lbs torque Driveline: FWD, Automatic Class: Mid-Size Sedan EPA Rating: 21/30 Eco-Modder Testing: Driving Style: Highway Cruise -- avg. 5-15 under limit of 65-75 (consistent headwinds) ____________ 29.1 MPG 53 MPH Average Speed 1006 Miles 18.9 Hours 34.5 Gallons -------------- Interior: "Sea of Grey" http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20148625-E.jpg The Sirius Sat Radio was a nice touch -- as was the stereo (sounded decent) BTW, this "Cooler Thing" did absolutely nothing... http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...20112823-E.jpg What a second, is that Bud Light? It did keep some maps and the driving stats+pen at a frigid 60 Degrees (not perfect for beverages). Conclusion: Don't bother. The thing's an anvil with "ACME" written all over it. RH77 |
Nice short review. I wondered how well that cooler worked. I have a simlar portable cooler that claims to cool up to 40°F below ambient. It rarely stays 10°F below though, even with icepacks in it.
|
For a 2.4L those hp and tq numbers seem pretty low for these days. The SXT 4 cyl weighs in at 3,405 lbs. Thats absolutely fat for a smaller car like that. Not enough torque to move it along. The AWD R/T comes in at 3,738 lbs. WOW.
This is Chryslers most fuel efficient car right now isnt it? The caliber replaced the neon and only is rated 29 highway, Neons were what, 38 or so? |
Quote:
Not replacing the Neon with something similar was a gigantic error on Chrysler's part. A 1.8L in either transmission would be a great combo for the little sedan. So, for the populace (since most drive automatics), the 1.8 isn't available for the Caliber automatic... The old numbers were in the high 30's. Adjusted for the new EPA testing, here are the numbers for the old Neon (City/Highway; Combined Cycle): 2.0L Manual_____25/33; Combined = 28 2.0L Automatic___22/29; Combined = 25 Caliber 2WD -- 1.8L Manual____24/29; Combined = 26 2.4L Manual____23/29; Combined = 25 2.0L Automatic__23/27; Combined = 24 2.4L Automatic__21/25; Combined = 23 RH77 |
Gee Rick but how did you really feel about the car.
|
Quote:
It was just frustrating to add a lot of time to my trip by driving 55, and the darn thing downshifted on moderate grades. Further, the transmission felt "mushy" and the radio controls were wonky. Otherwise, the handling was pretty good. There ya go :thumbup: Bottom line: there are better options, even Domestically. I'm waiting intently for your review of the Sebring :) "Mechanically identical" according to the industry. Yours is the luxury model, tho :p RH77 |
I know Mercedes was stingy with its parts bin and development money when they owned Chrysler but did they ever bother pushing this thing into a wind tunnel?
I had a base 95 neon for a few years. It was a real punishment box compared to anything else on the road but with a 130hp 2.0 engine, it could touch 40mpg even with my 70-80mph habit. Even in city traffic it rarely fell under 30mpg. Back in the day Dodge quoted the Cd at .33 for that car. I don't think they even bother releasing those kinds of specs anymore. Devolution at its best. EDIT Dodge avenger has drag coefficient of .326 http://www.carfolio.com/specificatio...tomobile-Dodge They've come a long way from 13 years ago...lol |
Quote:
http://zedequalszee.files.wordpress....11/redbull.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I did open up the intake on my wife's car, put AMSOIL in the crankcase, and it will now get 36.9 mpg on the highway (at 65 mph). We did this driving from Ogden, UT to Winnemucca, NV earlier this year. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com