EcoModder.com

EcoModder.com (https://ecomodder.com/forum/)
-   Aerodynamics (https://ecomodder.com/forum/aerodynamics.html)
-   -   CASE-STUDY: Mercedes-Benz C-111 / III (Cd 0.178) (https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/case-study-mercedes-benz-c-111-iii-cd-6455.html)

aerohead 12-17-2008 03:37 PM

CASE-STUDY: Mercedes-Benz C-111 / III (Cd 0.178)
 
I've wanted to post some case-studies of some "aero-modded" vehicles for the benefit of members and lurkers whom don't have access to some of the technical press.

The M-B 111/III knocked my socks off when I read about it, and I was still very impressed with the car when I got to see it first-hand at the Mercedes-Benz museum in 1997.

http://www.autoblog.com.es/fotos/mercedes/c1113.jpg

I can't format the material with tabs,'n such,so please forgive me for the "randomness" of the material.---------------------------------


The carMercedes-Benz 111/III
Height1,029mm(41.16 inches)
Width1,688mm(67.5 inches)
Length(competition)4,784mm(191.36 inches)
Curb Weight1,347 kg(2,965 pounds)
Power171.58 kW(230-hp)
Final Drive1.65:1
Engine5-cyl TD with intercooler
Chassisall-composite,fiberglass and carbon-fiber
Cd(competition)0.195
Roof slope @ tail11.5-degrees(my measurement)
Maximum cross-sectional area location2,589mm(103.56 inches from nose)
Fineness-Ratio4.64:1
Truncated Boat-Tail Length700mm(28 inches)
. .
PERFORMANCE.
Top Speed @ Nardo Test-Track,Italy315.157 km/h(195.398MPH)-continuous 24-hour driving.
Fuel Economy6.26 km/l(14.7mpg) @ 195.398 mph


Development of the car included an investigation of a full boat-tail,which added 1500mm length to car and dropped drag to Cd0.178.

A compromise was set at 700mm,which reduced the cars "base-drag" of Cd0.2378 down to Cd0.195 (a 18% drag reduction)

The full boat-tail reduced drag of the base car by 25%.

In full-tail form,the C-111 has a fineness ratio of 6.106:1,which in free-stream,above ground-effect would equate to 3:1,near the ideal teardrop.

Reference: CAR and DRIVER,September,1978,also Dr.Hans Liebold,Research Engineer,M-B,Report,as cited in Hucho,page 142,2nd edition.

aerohead 12-17-2008 03:40 PM

whoops!!!!!!
 
Sorry,the Cd in the thread header should read Cd0.178,not 0.173(senior moments!)

TestDrive 12-17-2008 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerohead (Post 79051)
I've wanted to post some case-studies of some "aero-modded" vehicles for the benefit of members and lurkers whom don't have access to some of the technical press.--------------------- The M-B 111/III knocked my socks off when I read about it, and I was still very impressed with the car when I got to see it first-hand at the Mercedes-Benz museum in 1997.---------------------------------- I can't format the material with tabs,'n such,so please forgive me for the "randomness" of the material.---------------------------------

Playing around with the newly introduced tables in the bb.

The carMercedes-Benz 111/III
Height1,029mm(41.16 inches)
Width1,688mm(67.5 inches)
Length(competition)4,784mm(191.36 inches)
Curb Weight1,347 kg(2,965 pounds)
Power171.58 kW(230-hp)
Final Drive1.65:1
Engine5-cyl TD with intercooler
Chassisall-composite,fiberglass and carbon-fiber
Cd(competition)0.195
Roof slope @ tail11.5-degrees(my measurement)
Maximum cross-sectional area location2,589mm(103.56 inches from nose)
Fineness-Ratio4.64:1
Truncated Boat-Tail Length700mm(28 inches)
. .
PERFORMANCE.
Top Speed @ Nardo Test-Track,Italy315.157 km/h(195.398MPH)-continuous 24-hour driving.
Fuel Economy6.26 km/l(14.7mpg) @ 195.398 mph


Quote:

(Reformated)
Development of the car included an investigation of a full boat-tail,which added 1500mm length to car and dropped drag to Cd0.178.

A compromise was set at 700mm,which reduced the cars "base-drag" of Cd0.2378 down to Cd0.195 (a 18% drag reduction)

The full boat-tail reduced drag of the base car by 25%.

In full-tail form,the C-111 has a fineness ratio of 6.106:1,which in free-stream,above ground-effect would equate to 3:1,near the ideal teardrop.

Reference: CAR and DRIVER,September,1978,also Dr.Hans Liebold,Research Engineer,M-B,Report,as cited in Hucho,page 142,2nd edition.

tasdrouille 12-17-2008 07:51 PM

I love that car

http://www.autoblog.com.es/fotos/mercedes/c1113.jpg

red91sit 12-17-2008 08:32 PM

The first "green" super car?! :turtle:

Christ 12-17-2008 08:38 PM

Dorsal ridge - Stability at speed?

red91sit 12-17-2008 10:02 PM

or possibley veintilation - rear visibility?

Christ 12-17-2008 10:07 PM

Not louver... dorsal "fin".

It's not a fin, scientifically... fins are independently mobile. It's a dorsal "ridge". Unless it's mobile.

If it has any function at all, I'd assume stability, since that's what just about anything that still has a dorsal ridge uses it for.

Anyone else notice the close appearance likeness to most european exotics?

Put a boattail on a Lambo Diablo and you've got that car, basically. At least it seems that way to me. PhotoChop, anyone?

TestDrive 12-17-2008 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tasdrouille (Post 79104)

Thanks for posting the picture. :D

The Atomic Ass 12-18-2008 03:33 AM

14.7mpg @ 195mph?! :eek:

DO WANT! :D

If it can do that at 195, I can only imagine what it gets at more sane speeds. :thumbup:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com