![]() |
Cash for Clunkers results fudging
This was a pretty interesting and eye-opening read: Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy — Autoblog
Basically, the government fudged the way they did the counting to bias small, foreign cars, when the real winners under the program actually included more trucks and domestics. Here's the government top ten list with the real list for comparison: Quote:
|
SVOboy -
Very interesting. But I'm more happy that the domestics (Ford) did better than reported. CarloSW2 |
Can't say I'm particularly surprised by the story.
If the government was interested in promoting the purchase of more fuel-efficient vehicles, they'd forget about programs like this and just raise the gasoline tax. The fact that they don't says all you need to know about programs like this one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My question: is the data reporting complete?
It seems like a big topic was the slow speed at which clunker payment was being processed. Could it be the same for running the stats? Are the invoices for clunker payment attached to a vehicle purchase? If so, there's a mound of paperwork to file and report. Also, I have questions on Edmunds source. It sounds like they took an informal poll of their own and published the results. I'm not convinced by either side just yet... RH77 |
Quote:
|
I don't know who's right, but from reading the article at that link, I'm pretty sure I'm not going to be taking this John McElroy as an unbiased source :-)
|
I am just waiting for the "USed Car Bailout" because of all these Decent cars that were "Killed" that could have easily have been resold. as well as the "Cradit" bailout for those who purchased cars in this program that cannot afford to make the payments.
Lies - damn lies - statics |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com