CFD of a Tank
Can somebody do a CFD of a tank for me? :D
I'm especially interested in what the big turret barrel does, but also everything else as well (of course). :thumbup: |
I have to be the first to say it; I bet that it's a better Cd going backwards.
|
I tend to believe that, but like to see some proper ABA testing to be sure ;)
|
A few images for inspiration.
Computer Tank Fighting http://media.caranddriver.com/images...s-original.jpg El Paso, Texas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Anna_Range.jpg Note: would help the Cd is they could keep the turret straight.:D M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/tank/M1/M1.gif Quote:
Defence and Freedom: January 2011 http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_V7Ehj7eG65...ian+Abrams.jpg https://www.google.com/search?q=coff...icient&spell=1 http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/c/imag...7784/size0.jpg I think that the rounder Russian/Soviet T-Series tanks would have better aero than an Abrams M1, but I went with one of ours. |
"Don't look for a place you can remove a ton. Look for 2000 places you can remove a pound."
|
As is too often the case, we did better in earlier iterations. I mean, look at these full fender skirts!
http://someinterestingfacts.net/wp-c...ank-armour.jpg |
Aerodynamics would probably be significantly improved if they removed the flag(s) and antennae(s)...
At least they fit them with full belly pans from the factory... |
@kach22i: I agree backwards would probably be better. I think I have heard of tank sqaudrons turning the turret around if they need to go faster. A CFD would prove it though! Thanks for the pics BTW. Also, I like the national pride, none of these outsider options! Murica! :)
I like the quote about the exhaust temp. I'm surprised they don't turbo it to use up some of that energy. It is a diesel, isn't it? @RedDevil: I know somebody in the Navy and another in the Air Force. Don't know of somebody who can let me "borrow" a tank for the day. Besides, where do I hook up my Ultragauge! :p @elhigh: I'm not sure what you meant by the quote, but I assume you were eluding to fixing the millions of cars on the road, rather than a few tanks. If that is what you meant, then my response would be this is just a fun excercise basedoff a day-dream thought I had. If that's not what you meant can you please explain. :confused: Would the shape of a WWI tank work today (obviously with updated hardware)? @NachtRitter: Yeah, they need to get one of those headliner type antennaes! Too bad the belly pans from the factory are X amount tons! ----------------- OK, in all seriousness, can somebody do this so we can see what it looks like? Thanks! :thumbup: |
Me know nothing about CFD, but let's try this:
http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/2010/fw9o.jpg Astonishingly, it fits rather... Nah. |
Quote:
My guess would be that the turbulent wake on a modern tank is around four times the size of the tanks frontal area - a complete mess ! I just tried to get a model into Falcon ( CFD ) but i keep getting crashes. Off to bed. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com