EcoModder.com

EcoModder.com (https://ecomodder.com/forum/)
-   General Efficiency Discussion (https://ecomodder.com/forum/general-efficiency-discussion.html)
-   -   Cruze Diesel = 46 MPG Hwy (https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/cruze-diesel-46-mpg-hwy-25600.html)

Blue Angel 04-18-2013 10:12 AM

Cruze Diesel = 46 MPG Hwy
 
I'm putting this in success stories because I think creating the car with the highest highway fuel efficiency available in North America is a real success. And it has an Automatic transmission!

Click the link:

Chevy Cruze Diesel Bests Jetta TDI With 46 MPG | AutoGuide.com News

PaleMelanesian 04-18-2013 10:33 AM

From the horse's mouth:
Chevrolet Cruze Diesel 46 MPG Sets Highway Fuel Economy Benchmark

I hope it's available with a manual as well, and gets the same rating in a manual. I'm hopeful about its potential rating, since the gas Eco with manual was rated higher than the auto. Sadly, I'm not hopeful about a manual being offered.

MetroMPG 04-18-2013 11:47 AM

It's a success story, but that subforum is meant for members' accomplishments. Moved to general efficiency! :P

And, wow, that's quite the jump from the Jetta's highway number.

Just yesterday, Mitsu announced the fuel economy of the Mirage for Canada with a 4.4 L/100 km highway rating. That unseated the Cruze Eco highway rating as the previous best among non-hybrids in Canada. One day later, GM takes it back with Cruze diesel. :D

I love the competition!

ciderbarrel 04-18-2013 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Angel (Post 367199)
I'm putting this in success stories because I think creating the car with the highest highway fuel efficiency available in North America is a real success.

The Jetta Hybrid, with a 7-speed DSG automatic, gets 48 MPG highway.

Blue Angel 04-18-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ciderbarrel (Post 367214)
The Jetta Hybrid, with a 7-speed DSG automatic, gets 48 MPG highway.

Forgot to add "non-hybrid" to my post... that's covered in the story. The Prius' EPA highway rating is also 48 MPG.

Looking at the "city" driving loop (varying speeds, acceleration, deceleration) I wonder if the hybrids actually get better real highway mileage than non-hybrids, i.e. cruise control set at a certain speed for long stretches of highway? Their hybrid systems wouldn't really be much benefit on level ground at steady speed?

I could see the Prius' aerodynamic shape being a great benefit, but what about other hybrids that are based on normal (good looking) cars?

Blue Angel 04-18-2013 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG (Post 367212)
Just yesterday, Mitsu announced the fuel economy of the Mirage for Canada with a 4.4 L/100 km highway rating. That unseated the Cruze Eco highway rating as the previous best among non-hybrids in Canada. One day later, GM takes it back with Cruze diesel.

Have the numbers for the Cruze Diesel and Mitsu Mirage been released in Canada, or are you just assuming based on the EPA numbers?

Oh, and agreed about the move to this forum. I was torn between the two, but the description for this one was a little off for the topic, I thought:

"Transportation & efficiency topics that don't really fit in any of the above."

I had a 50/50 chance and I got it wrong... happens all the time! :D

PaleMelanesian 04-18-2013 12:16 PM

Hybrid: Reality - Road & Track
Conclusion: the Prius beat the TDI's mileage in ALL conditions, including cruise control highway. That may change with the new set of DEF-equipped diesels, though. The fuel burned during DPF regeneration really hurts the mileage, and DEF removes that problem.

sarguy01 04-18-2013 12:37 PM

My frugal mind is thinking, "How much does the Cruze Diesel cost??"

Answer, it will start at $25,600, according to the article. Ouch. 46 mpg is awesome, but it costs what, $9,000ish more than a regular gas Cruze? So, if we were speaking strictly on price, the Cruze diesel would never really break even over the 42 mpg hwy Cruze Eco, considering the cost of diesel is higher than the cost of gas. So, one would pay a lot more for the diesel option, then more for diesel at the pump and finally, more for diesel maintenance, correct? This is also assuming that one is set on buying a Cruze and no other car model.

Of course, I am basing this off of price alone and using EPA ratings and that article's estimations. I am not taking into account the gains that can be had by driving, modding, etc.

I am just throwing this out there as food for thought.

MetroMPG 04-18-2013 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Angel (Post 367218)
Have the numbers for the Cruze Diesel and Mitsu Mirage been released in Canada

The Canadian Mirage fuel economy numbers came out yesterday (see here). The diesel Cruze numbers aren't out, but the EPA number is so much higher, it's going to beat 4.4 highway per NRCAN, no doubt.

MetroMPG 04-18-2013 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarguy01 (Post 367223)
My frugal mind is thinking, "How much does the Cruze Diesel cost??"

We'll always be better off buying a $2000 Civic/Corolla/Metro/Saturn in terms of total cost of ownership. :D (And the guys who buy a $1000 Civic/Corolla/Metro/Saturn will be better off still.)

I'll never own a Cruze diesel, but I'm still impressed by the big numbers.

sarguy01 04-18-2013 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG (Post 367226)
We'll always be better off buying a $2000 Civic/Corolla/Metro/Saturn in terms of total cost of ownership. :D

I'll never own a Cruze diesel, but I'm still impressed by the big numbers.

I am really impressed as well. These cars are all steps in the right direction.

Blue Angel 04-18-2013 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarguy01 (Post 367223)
...it will start at $25,600, according to the article. Ouch. 46 mpg is awesome, but it costs what, $9,000ish more than a regular gas Cruze? So, if we were speaking strictly on price, the Cruze diesel would never really break even over the 42 mpg hwy Cruze Eco...

GM is benchmarking the price of the TDI Jetta. With an automatic transmission the Jetta TDI costs about $900 less than the Cruze TD; GM justifies the difference by including lots of additional features, like a leather interior.

The Cruze TD has two major flaws:

1. It is offered as a loaded line topping model only
2. It is not offered with a manual transmission

If they offered a TD option with manual transmission on the Cruze Eco for $1500 extra they would have a hit on their hands... it would cost appreciably less than the Jetta TDI and offer better fuel economy. Instead they have gone the BMW E90 335d route and made it the highest spec and most expensive model in the range. :confused: :( :rolleyes:

It's almost like they don't want to sell them...

PressEnter[] 04-18-2013 02:51 PM

Not bad. I test-drove a Cruze Eco 6-speed earlier this year and liked it, but not as much as the Jetta (as you can see :p ). I realize I may get a skewed perspective being on car forums, but it seems like TDI fans love their manuals. I think Chevy is making a mistake not offering it.

sarguy01 04-18-2013 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Angel (Post 367236)
GM is benchmarking the price of the TDI Jetta. With an automatic transmission the Jetta TDI costs about $900 less than the Cruze TD; GM justifies the difference by including lots of additional features, like a leather interior.

The Cruze TD has two major flaws:

1. It is offered as a loaded line topping model only
2. It is not offered with a manual transmission

If they offered a TD option with manual transmission on the Cruze Eco for $1500 extra they would have a hit on their hands... it would cost appreciably less than the Jetta TDI and offer better fuel economy. Instead they have gone the BMW E90 335d route and made it the highest spec and most expensive model in the range. :confused: :( :rolleyes:

It's almost like they don't want to sell them...

I think they are marketing it towards people who want a luxurious car that gets great gas mileage. Hence, no manual and only comes fully loaded. I think this the same as someone getting a brand new Prius (starting at $24,200). But, that person can get a brand new Civic, that doesn't get the same mileage, but will cost $6,000 less to purchase. It would take (by some very, very rough math...) 200,000 miles to recoup the cost, assuming maintenance costs are equal and that person bought the base model, etc. They both are nice cars. But, who keeps a brand new car for that long? Not too many people! It is the concept of high MPG that people are buying (or getting a loan for). If they are going to spend that much, why not get a hybrid?? They aren't adding up the cost, they just want to drive it.

I don't think the average American wants a bare bones car that gets great mileage. Plus, the car manufacturer wouldn't make much of a profit selling really cheap cars.

redpoint5 04-18-2013 07:31 PM

I too wish it had a manual option at a reduced price. Auto transmissions cost more, so the savings should be passed on to the customer.

The sad truth is that wealthier people are the ones able to afford to save money. What I mean by this, is that cash-strapped shoppers can't pay the hybrid or diesel premium to save money on fuel later. So, this diesel gets a lot of luxury standard (auto trans is perceived as luxury) and the price reflects this.

Blue Angel 04-19-2013 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PressEnter[] (Post 367244)
...it seems like TDI fans love their manuals. I think Chevy is making a mistake not offering it.

I agree 100%

VW has never stopped selling diesels in North America (I think?), and has been the only company offering small diesel powered cars since the 80's. Just about everyone knows by now that if you want a diesel you go to a VW dealer... TDI has almost become its own "brand".

GM is entering new territory with the Cruze TD. I guarantee that the general public will remain oblivious to its existence unless GM fires up a huge $$$ marketing campaign. Hardly anyone walking into a GM dealership is going to be headed there to investigate the Cruze TD... I believe most of their sales are going to be from "up-selling" people who were already looking at a Cruze LTZ. That doesn't look good.

The people who WILL know about the Cruze TD are the ones on the internet reading the car blogs and hanging out in forums like this... the ENTHUSIASTS. All of the "free" advertising hype surrounding the launch of the car will be getting to the very people who GM is not targetting by not offering a MUCH cheaper model with a manual transmission, since a large percentage of the enthusiasts are the ones who would want a manual.

The impact of the enthusiast should not be overlooked. If it were not for the enthusiasts, the internet would be all but void of interesting car related stuff. The only thing on the internet would be company websites and stale car reviews watered down for the general public.

PressEnter[] 04-19-2013 01:32 PM

VW has stuck with the diesel, but I think there was a gap for the 2007 and 2008 model years, where the old 1.9 PD engine was replaced with the current 2.0L CRD.

tjts1 04-19-2013 11:13 PM

And only 27mpg city, 1 shy of the $5000 cheaper Cruze ECO. Do I have to mention the price of diesel fuel?

Yeah thats what I thought.

PressEnter[] 04-20-2013 06:56 AM

If the diesel Cruze is anything like the TDI's, it will not be hard to beat the EPA rating, even without careful driving. So far for me it looks like 40/50+

While the cost of the diesel engine is significant, I don't feel like the price of diesel fuel is. I'm not a math genius, but I did some calculations before I bought the Jetta, and my estimate is that you need an extra 4 mpg to break even with the cost of diesel compared to regular unleaded. In real world driving, I expect the diesel Cruze will return this over the Cruze Eco.

tjts1 04-20-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PressEnter[] (Post 367467)
If the diesel Cruze is anything like the TDI's, it will not be hard to beat the EPA rating, even without careful driving. So far for me it looks like 40/50+

And its not hard to beat the EPA rating with the gasoline engine either.
CruzeEco1.4t 6mt (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
2012 Chevy Cruze Eco 6MT (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
2012 Cruze Eco MT (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
Penelope (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
Cruze ECO manual (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
Cruze Eco (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
ECO (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
Cruze (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
Cruze Eco M/T (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
2012 Cruze (Chevrolet Cruze) | Fuelly
The diesel has NO advantage in this department. This seems to be a really popular argument with TDI fans for some reason. They seem to think that gasoline engine can't beat their EPA numbers but diesels can. Thats simply not true. You can very easily do so with both.

They way GM packaged the diesel Cruze for the US market is a colossal failure. They should have offered the same 1.7L engine they sell in the rest of the world with both a manual and automatic and built it on the Cruze eco platform which is substantially different from all other cruze models. That would have been an honest 40/50mpg car. Instead they brought over this bloated over priced barge. Nobody buys a $26000 cruze. In a couple of years after these cars languished on dealer lots with cash on the hood for months and months, GM is going to point at the diesel cruze and say "SEE? Americans don't want diesels and thats the end of that".

WesternStarSCR 04-22-2013 08:07 AM

huh?
 
So as far as you know, it is not going to offered manual, and not even with the "Eco"s mods of belly pans and active front grill shutters etc?

I had a "bit" higher hopes for the new GM to be more in tune and current with trends, and not lagging behind so much what would make sense.

They need to hire Dr. Spock as a logic consultant.

Blue Angel 04-22-2013 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjts1
And its not hard to beat the EPA rating with the gasoline engine either.

Agreed... look at my fuel log in my sig (Eco MT). This is with careful driving, but I'm still averaging above the HWY figure of 42 MPG. The combined rating of 33 MPG is the same as the Eco.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WesternStarSCR
So as far as you know, it is not going to offered manual, and not even with the "Eco"s mods of belly pans and active front grill shutters etc?

The Cruze TD will have all of the Eco's toys, including the active shutters, belly pans, LRR tires etc. Some reports claimed the aero of the TD was even better than the Eco, but I have yet to see any details to back this up.

The TD will weigh more than the Eco. It is a loaded model with an automatic transmission, leather, even more sound deadening than a standard Cruze (the Eco has less), and a urea tank in the spare tire well. There's also no mention of special wheels, so I'm assuming the car has heavy cast wheels like the other Cruze models (the Eco has 17.8lb alcoa forged wheels, 17x7).

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjts1
Nobody buys a $26000 cruze. In a couple of years after these cars languished on dealer lots with cash on the hood for months and months, GM is going to point at the diesel cruze and say "SEE? Americans don't want diesels and thats the end of that".

This is my fear as well. Very few people go looking to spend $26k on a Cruze, especially those who are looking for fuel savings... people who want a high tech "luxury car" are, unfortunately, not lining up at Chevy dealerships (yet).

My greatest fear is not that GM will give up on diesels, but that other manufacturers will based on GM's experiment. Let's face it; fuel efficiency is not the #1 concern of the average buyer in our markets. At $26k there are MUCH nicer cars available than a Cruze, especially since the Cruze TD LOOKS the same as a base model... they could have at least dressed it up a bit with the LTZ RS body bits to make it look a little better! It doesn't even have fog lights!

ciderbarrel 04-22-2013 06:00 PM

No MT is a huge deal breaker for me, even if I looked at one in the used market 3-5 years down the line.

darcane 06-17-2013 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Angel (Post 367236)
GM is benchmarking the price of the TDI Jetta. With an automatic transmission the Jetta TDI costs about $900 less than the Cruze TD; GM justifies the difference by including lots of additional features, like a leather interior.

The Cruze TD has two major flaws:

1. It is offered as a loaded line topping model only
2. It is not offered with a manual transmission

If they offered a TD option with manual transmission on the Cruze Eco for $1500 extra they would have a hit on their hands... it would cost appreciably less than the Jetta TDI and offer better fuel economy. Instead they have gone the BMW E90 335d route and made it the highest spec and most expensive model in the range. :confused: :( :rolleyes:

It's almost like they don't want to sell them...

While GM is worse than VW in this regard, VW does it too. You can't buy a base model Jetta or Passat with a TDi. The TDi is based off the SE which has more options and then has a few others thrown in there too.

I suspect that they do this because the actual additional cost of a diesel that meets our stringent EPA requirements isn't recouped by the price of the diesel option alone. So, it gets packaged with other "options" to get the margins to acceptable levels.

redpoint5 06-17-2013 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darcane (Post 376754)
While GM is worse than VW in this regard, VW does it too. You can't buy a base model Jetta or Passat with a TDi. The TDi is based off the SE which has more options and then has a few others thrown in there too.

I'll take this opportunity to thead-jack since you sound knowledgeable...

I recently came to the conclusion that I need a Jetta Wagon TDI manual gearbox in the 2003 or similar model year. Was such a vehicle even offered in the US? I can't find any.

gone-ot 06-17-2013 09:02 PM

For a period of time, VW did not (could not) sell diesels in USA because they didn't meet the newly tightened EPA emission requirements. Look in the EPA Fuel Economy listings and you won't see ANY small VW diesels listed for certain years.

darcane 06-18-2013 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redpoint5 (Post 376756)
I'll take this opportunity to thead-jack since you sound knowledgeable...

I recently came to the conclusion that I need a Jetta Wagon TDI manual gearbox in the 2003 or similar model year. Was such a vehicle even offered in the US? I can't find any.

Well, I won't claim any real expertise here. I'm actually somewhat anti-VW, but there are tons of them around this area.

Anywho, a quick search on ye ol' list of Craig found four near me:
2005 VW Jetta tdi wagon 5speed manual GLS diesel only 92k mi
VW TDI WAGON, 2003 5spd manual trans, Baltic Green w/Black interior
2005 VW Jetta Wagon tdi - Rare 5 speed manual - Inspected & Serviced -
2005 Volkswagen Jetta GLS TDI Wagon - 5 speed manual

So, looks like they are available. Funny, three of those are also in Portland Craigslist (local to you?).

UFO 06-19-2013 11:06 AM

If this diesel has a urea tank, perhaps it can be fueled with B100 unlike the new VWs. If that's the case, I will consider getting one because it is one of the only options to use 100% renewable fuel. I will never get another gasser, even a hybrid, but I am considering an all-electric.

redpoint5 06-19-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darcane (Post 376872)
Well, I won't claim any real expertise here. I'm actually somewhat anti-VW, but there are tons of them around this area.

Anywho, a quick search on ye ol' list of Craig found four near me:
2005 VW Jetta tdi wagon 5speed manual GLS diesel only 92k mi
VW TDI WAGON, 2003 5spd manual trans, Baltic Green w/Black interior
2005 VW Jetta Wagon tdi - Rare 5 speed manual - Inspected & Serviced -
2005 Volkswagen Jetta GLS TDI Wagon - 5 speed manual

So, looks like they are available. Funny, three of those are also in Portland Craigslist (local to you?).

I'm almost as anti-VW as they come, but it's hard to pass on a 50 mpg oil burner with good interior room. Many of the Golf models are considered reliable cars by consumer reports, although the Jetta generally isn't for some reason.

Maybe I'm looking for a year 2002 or 2003 Mk4 TDI; one that doesn't have a lot of emission control devices and gets the best fuel economy. Fueleconomy.gov shows the '04 and later models getting 4 less mpg.

Portland is my market, so that is convenient, but Seattle is within the range I'm willing to travel. Besides, I haven't been to Sea-town since I was a kid.

As much as I dislike VW, I absolutely loath stealerships. I'm going to avoid them if at all possible, but sometimes that is the only option when looking for a rare vehicle. I still don't know why trading in vehicles is more popular than selling private party. All of my experiences have been very easy and pleasant. I made $1000 from purchasing an Outback, driving it for a month, and then selling it. I'd like to see someone pull that off with a dealer purchased vehicle.

I'm basically sold on either the TDI wagon, and old Subaru Legacy, a Corolla, or a 2nd gen Prius.

PressEnter[] 06-19-2013 01:42 PM

Good luck redpoint...have you started shopping around? If not, don't be surprised by high prices, especially in areas that don't use a lot of road salt.

darcane 06-19-2013 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redpoint5 (Post 376986)
I'm almost as anti-VW as they come, but it's hard to pass on a 50 mpg oil burner with good interior room. Many of the Golf models are considered reliable cars by consumer reports, although the Jetta generally isn't for some reason.

Maybe I'm looking for a year 2002 or 2003 Mk4 TDI; one that doesn't have a lot of emission control devices and gets the best fuel economy. Fueleconomy.gov shows the '04 and later models getting 4 less mpg.

Portland is my market, so that is convenient, but Seattle is within the range I'm willing to travel. Besides, I haven't been to Sea-town since I was a kid.

As much as I dislike VW, I absolutely loath stealerships. I'm going to avoid them if at all possible, but sometimes that is the only option when looking for a rare vehicle. I still don't know why trading in vehicles is more popular than selling private party. All of my experiences have been very easy and pleasant. I made $1000 from purchasing an Outback, driving it for a month, and then selling it. I'd like to see someone pull that off with a dealer purchased vehicle.

I'm basically sold on either the TDI wagon, and old Subaru Legacy, a Corolla, or a 2nd gen Prius.

Well, you are just like me then. I have never bought new, and only once ever bought from a dealership. I recently sold my '03 Silverado for $100 less than I bought it for after having it four years and 40k miles. That won't happen with dealerships involved.

The green '03 appears to be for sale by owner if the miles aren't too high for you. Looks like the original owner with good service records.

GreenHornet 06-30-2013 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue Angel (Post 367745)
Agreed... look at my fuel log in my sig (Eco MT). This is with careful driving, but I'm still averaging above the HWY figure of 42 MPG. The combined rating of 33 MPG is the same as the Eco.



The Cruze TD will have all of the Eco's toys, including the active shutters, belly pans, LRR tires etc. Some reports claimed the aero of the TD was even better than the Eco, but I have yet to see any details to back this up.

The TD will weigh more than the Eco. It is a loaded model with an automatic transmission, leather, even more sound deadening than a standard Cruze (the Eco has less), and a urea tank in the spare tire well. There's also no mention of special wheels, so I'm assuming the car has heavy cast wheels like the other Cruze models (the Eco has 17.8lb alcoa forged wheels, 17x7).



This is my fear as well. Very few people go looking to spend $26k on a Cruze, especially those who are looking for fuel savings... people who want a high tech "luxury car" are, unfortunately, not lining up at Chevy dealerships (yet).

My greatest fear is not that GM will give up on diesels, but that other manufacturers will based on GM's experiment. Let's face it; fuel efficiency is not the #1 concern of the average buyer in our markets. At $26k there are MUCH nicer cars available than a Cruze, especially since the Cruze TD LOOKS the same as a base model... they could have at least dressed it up a bit with the LTZ RS body bits to make it look a little better! It doesn't even have fog lights!

I worked for Gm and specialized in the Cruze :-)

What I know is that automatics sell more pure and simple and they are only looking at the numbers of the many and not the few. So they think they can offset the price difference by going automatic. Personally I would have liked to see a manual option as well however they do have the automatic geared pretty well for fuel economy and the diesel powerplant. I think they will sell but I am unsure just how much. The cruze is appealing to many people but the fact still remains its diesel and here in the states it takes a back seat to gas powered vehicles. Only time will tell and I am looking forward to its debut in the US marketplace.

GH

gone-ot 07-01-2013 12:20 AM

The only saving-grace to GM's *current* diesel Cruze marketing *plan* is that diesels ARE highly sought in both Canada and Mexico, the *other* two North America markets that Lordstown builds 100% of Cruze vehicles for.

cRiPpLe_rOoStEr 07-01-2013 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Tele man (Post 378609)
The only saving-grace to GM's *current* diesel Cruze marketing *plan* is that diesels ARE highly sought in both Canada and Mexico, the *other* two North America markets that Lordstown builds 100% of Cruze vehicles for.

Both Canadians and Mexicans are more open-minded regarding Diesels, but I can't expect an average Mexican to not complain about the SCR.

gone-ot 07-02-2013 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr (Post 378715)
Both Canadians and Mexicans are more open-minded regarding Diesels, but I can't expect an average Mexican to not complain about the SCR.

True, especially when his donkey leaves more (tangible) pollution than a diesel does soot.

tjts1 07-02-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Tele man (Post 378768)
True, especially when his donkey leaves more (tangible) pollution than a diesel does soot.

How many donkeys would you have to trade in for a Cruze?

gone-ot 07-02-2013 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tjts1 (Post 378796)
How many donkeys would you have to trade in for a Cruze?

...uh, probably depends upon what is *inside* the bundles he's carrying (wink,wink).

PressEnter[] 07-02-2013 01:20 PM

Huh. I didn't know Canadians used donkeys.

tjts1 07-02-2013 04:39 PM

Well now you do.
http://rlv.zcache.com/kiss_my_canadi..._8nhmf_512.jpg

Blue Angel 07-08-2013 10:22 AM

Loving that T-Shirt! Ha!

The Cruze TD's Canadian consumption is out: 4.2 L/100km Hwy

Chevrolet Cruze Diesel 4.2 L/100km Sets Highway Fuel Consumption Benchmark

Darn impressive... I wonder what it would do with a manual transmission and some nice tall gearing? :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com