![]() |
Do Hybrids Really Make Sense?
So many people buy hybrids to either boost their fuel economy, protect the environment, or both, but how many of them actually understand the principles of physics and thermal dynamics? Are hybrids really any more fuel efficient than a regular full time gasoline burning car?
|
Quote:
The day I bought my first Insight and drove it home I got stuck in a traffic jam and a rainstorm and had the AC blasting, and still managed to average 61 mpg. Since then I have learned to drive the Insight better and average in the high sixties, tank after tank. There's a reason the Gen-1 Insights top the list of teams in the challenge. Not sure what your question really is. |
People will argue on the environmental question until the cows come home and ultimately believe what they want to.
But you can't argue that they save fuel vs. comparable ICE only vehicles for typical drivers, WHEN that's their design goal. While some hybrids have "performance" design goals, or "too mild" hybrid systems, and the fuel savings aren't there. |
I feel the difference every time I pass the gas station on my way to another 600+ mile tank, so I'm as convinced as I need to be, lol.
If I had a shorter commute maybe I'd swap to a full EV, but as far as realistically attainable vehicles versus my daily commute, I think I'm about maxed out. |
I have noticed that Hybrids typically come with instrumentation that could show a driver how to drive more efficiently, and that many hybrid owners are interested in conserving fuel. I have also noticed that people in this forum have reported significant gains in their fuel economy since installing a scangauge or comparable instrumentation, and like many hybrid owners, the people who use a scangauge are interested in boosting their fuel economy.
What I am concerned about, is that I can't find any actual data that supports hybrids being able to be more efficient. I am not talking about mpg claims, I am talking about science. What technology makes a hybrid any more efficient than the comparable ICE? |
Quote:
1) Hybrids have a downsized ICE vs. a comparable non-hybrid = more efficient when running. 2) Hybrids kill the ICE when propulsion is not required (coasting/when stopped) = more efficient in those scenarios. 3) Regenerative braking (and coasting) captures energy for later use that would otherwise be wasted = more efficient than no regen. 4) Many hybrids permit limited, low speed electric propulsion, rather than ICE propulsion = more efficient again. |
Here's how the Insight hybrid technology works:
Let's say you have a wagon pulled by a horse (ICE). The horse can pull it from a dead stop of course, but he's really only comfortable plodding along at speed, that's where he is at his best. So you hook up a pony with him (IMA) and the pony helps get the wagon rolling from a dead stop, pulling as hard as he can to get the wagon up to speed. The pony tires out quick, but he helps keep the horse fresh for the long haul. When the wagon is cruising at speed, the pony jumps up in the wagon with you and the horse happily pulls you down the path. When the wagon slows down, the pony jumps back out to eat, and the horse and pony both get some rest when you stop. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Then there's marketing. I mean styling. I mean aerodynamics.
Because hybrids tend to be marketed as efficient, stylists have to make the cars look it, so we get the "hybrid look." The marketing folks won't let other cars be aerodynamic because that'll dilute the "I'm Efficient" look that they've assigned to hybrids. |
Is there anything unique to a hybrid other than the ability to harvest and redistribute wasted braking energy that can't be done on an ICE?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com