Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2008, 03:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 124

6th Gen Coupe - '02 Honda Accord EX 4 cyl
90 day: 28.01 mpg (US)

Zombie Accord - '98 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 24.71 mpg (US)

Ol' Red - '96 Ford F-150 XL
90 day: 14.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Honda as a green company - perception overshadowing reality?

I believe it was SVOboy who recently posted an article which stated that Honda was the only major car manufacturer currently seeing gains in automobile sales. So strictly speaking to 2008 car models for sale, is Honda really that green in comparison to other car manufacturers?

Honda:

Fit: Subcompact - 28/34/31
Civic: Compact - 26/34/29
Accord: Full Size - 22/31/25
Civic Hybrid: Compact Hybrid - 40/45/42

GM:

Aveo: Subcompact - 24/31/27
Cobalt XFE: 25/36/29
Malibu: Midsize: Automatic Only - 22/30/25
Impala: Full Size: Automatic Only - 18/29/22 (E85 capable also)
Malibu Hybrid: Midsize Hybrid - 24/32/27
Pontiac G5 XFE: Subcompact - 25/35/29
Vibe: Station Wagon/Hatchback - 25/33/29

Ford:

Focus: Compact - 24/35/28
Fusion/Taurus - Both are poor in FE

Toyota:

Yaris: Subcompact - 29/36/32
Corolla: Compact - 28/37/31
Prius: Midsize Hybrid - 48/45/46
Camry Hybrid: Midsize - 33/34/34
Camry: Midsize - 21/31/25
Avalon: Full Size - 19/28/22


What I get from this list is that Toyota is far and away the greenest manufacturer right now. Toyota offers more hybrids in their lineup than any other car company, and they have 4 cars which average over 30 EPA MPG. Some of these cars are well over that mark.

Honda is second in line in terms of fuel efficiency, though they eclipse GM only because of the Civic Hybrid. The Civic has poor fuel economy by Civic standards, and is essentially tied with the Cobalt XFE. Aveo returned poor FE for a subcompact, and was even beaten out by the larger Cobalt, which leads me to wonder why there isn't an XFE version of the Aveo. Honda's Fit returns middle of the road subcompact FE.

GM's Impala and Malibu were available with only automatic transmissions, and are contrasted with the Accord, which was available with a manual, making this a slightly unfair comparison. That said, Honda won out slightly with the Accord (though you can take it with a grain of salt). Impala was available with e85, which Accord was not. But then again there was also a CNG variant of the Civic, so no net difference there.

The Civic Hybrid is the only car that really sets these two apart.

So this all leads me to the question of why people see Honda as such a green company. Could it be their past history for making highly fuel efficient cars? They seem to have a really bright future with the FCX Clarity potentially going into production down the road, but right now they're not nearly as superior to GM in terms of efficiency as people claim and Toyota kicks them all in the ass.

Just musing here. If it came down to it, I would probably buy a Honda for reliability.... though, every Chevy in our family has been 100% reliable as well.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-19-2008, 03:31 AM   #2 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Fuel economy does not a "Green" company make.

In fact, it was nissan that won the "greenest car maker" distinction from the japanese government this year, even though their FE isn't nearly as good as Honda or Toyota.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 03:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 124

6th Gen Coupe - '02 Honda Accord EX 4 cyl
90 day: 28.01 mpg (US)

Zombie Accord - '98 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 24.71 mpg (US)

Ol' Red - '96 Ford F-150 XL
90 day: 14.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Sure, I get that. Emissions are hardly measurable to the common driver and the people who buy the cars though. How many people can actually tell you whether or not a Cobalt or Civic put out more carbon particles per mile? Moreover, how many people actually take that into consideration when buying a car?

Clearly people have been taking something into consideration when making Honda the far and away #1 choice this year, and I suspect FE is one of the big reasons.

Perhaps I should have just named this "Honda as a fuel efficient company".
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 03:41 AM   #4 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Well, I think if you look at the sales figures you'll see that Toyota saw it's drop from they're trucks and SUVs can smashed, which is just a market Honda never entered. If they had I'm sure they'd be sad about it, too,
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 03:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 61

RSX - '02 Acura RSX base
90 day: 37.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah you have to include the yoder trucks in there too. Im sure that will put honda average fleet MPGs higher. Just wait until the new honda hybrid comes out, Im hearing 55-71 mpg and a price as low as 19k. 55mpg is the more likely end of the range in the states.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 05:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 124

6th Gen Coupe - '02 Honda Accord EX 4 cyl
90 day: 28.01 mpg (US)

Zombie Accord - '98 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 24.71 mpg (US)

Ol' Red - '96 Ford F-150 XL
90 day: 14.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
I suppose that would make sense, since Honda doesn't really make heavy duty trucks.

It also doesn't change the fact that Toyota is still manufactures the most fuel efficient cars out there. I wonder what the sales comparisons are when only cars are looked at.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 07:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
akcapeco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 104

V-strom 650 - '07 Suzuki DL-650 V-strom
90 day: 55.03 mpg (US)

07 Focus ZXW - '07 Ford Focus ZXW SE
90 day: 30.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Remeber, "green" car companies are not ranked like football teams.

You are talking about a reputation... hence any snapshot you take has to be chronologically and geographically more broad than what you are looking at here. Look at the global picture over time, and the company does well.

It doesn't hurt that Honda has consistently and voluntarily made not insignificant contributions in the area of emissions and efficiency.

Honda innovated the CVCC engine in the 1970's, eliminating the need for a catalytic converter, when other car companies were vocally arguing that the emissions requirements could not be met.

In 1998, Honda introduced its first natural gas powered Civic, and today is the only company that markets a factory built CNG car directly to the public. (See T. Boone Pickens, Jr.).

Honda introduced and marketed in 1999, nine years ago, an aluminum-bodied, highly aerodynamic vehicle and uniquely, ingeniously and hybridly powered car.

There are other specific examples, but either way, Honda is a leader if not the leader.
__________________


Last edited by akcapeco; 07-20-2008 at 06:14 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 07:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 328

Meat-roll - '97 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 55.4 mpg (US)

Wife's Brruik - '03 Buick Century
90 day: 30.84 mpg (US)

Blue Balt - '08 Chevrolet Cobalt XFE
Team Chevy
90 day: 38.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
They say perception is all that matters. If more people looked deeper auto sales would be very different than they are now across the board.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 01:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by atomicradish View Post
I suppose that would make sense, since Honda doesn't really make heavy duty trucks.
Honda doesn't make trucks at all, for the US market. (The Ridgeline is not a truck, but a large sedan without the trunk lid.)

As to the general question, you have to look at the fleet average, and at where the marketing dollar goes. Toyota may make some vehicles with good fuel economy; GM & Ford may sell some rebadged Japanese or Korean cars, but they mostly build and market the larger vehicles. Honda doesn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 02:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts
I have a different take on it. Honda is making gains because their price point is right and they make very reliable cars. In hard times people want something that will last and although they might not have the best MPG's they give a great bang for the buck. Consumer reports on reliability.

__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pick Your Poison - Whose gas to buy? SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 84 11-22-2010 10:19 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com