Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-25-2013, 08:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Running Alt. from the gearbox?

I was recently watching the 24 Hours of LeMans and they said some of the cars run their alternators from the gearbox. The idea I guess is to not have as much drag on the engine to help with HP. I realize these cars do run 24 hours straight and not stop and go like ours, but not knowing anything about anything, wouldn't the drag on the gearbox be nearly the same as the drag on the engine? I mean, aren't they physically connected?

In my completely non-mechanical mind, if this is a better set-up, then why couldn't we run an Alt. or P/S pump from the driveshaft in some kind of mechanical/magical way?

I say this somewhat in jest as I know using the gearbox(trans/driveshaft) has to be super expensive and highly technical, but it is an interesting idea. A toothed ring (perfectly balanced mind you) around the driveshaft with a smaller gear on an Alt. or P/S pump mounted under the bed of a pick-up. I assume that there would be the same drag on the driveline no matter where you put the Alt in this mythical system. Would this actually "free up" HP for any kind of FE increase? Hypothetically not in actuality.

Maybe this should be in the Unicorn section.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-25-2013, 08:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
Another thought just went through my pea sized brain.

How about a 4WD set up with some different gearing (more efficient) running the rear "output" to a 2WD rear-end and using the front "output" to drive the Alt. and P/S, etc. Maybe everything except the water pump?

Just another thought from the guy who thinks too much.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
Yeah, No. The further down the line you put stuff the less efficient it is due to having to be driven through an inefficient component. It isn't like a huge loss, but if the gearbox is 95% efficient at driving something, and it is pulling the alternator the whole time, than there is a 5% loss to the power required to drive the alternator as opposed to when it is driven directly by the engine.

Not to mention what it would do to your pulse & glide performance if you were to factor that in.

And mechanically speaking, do we really want the high amperage electric thingy hanging in the wind/rain/dirt/mud stream that is the underside of our cars.

I suspect that they drive it from the gear box on the race cars because it's 1 less belt to worry about, they don't care about pulse & glide, and if engineered well, I bet it's a bullet proof connection to drive the alternator with. I bet a ham sandwich though that the thing is sticking up half way into the foot well of the front passenger seat if it is a hopped up version of a Aston, Vette, or Beemer....Never mind that honey, just keep your feet off it, it's probably a little warm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:32 AM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
It shouldn't make a difference HP wise. Its a load on the engine no matter where it is.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 475

Oh Deer - '03 Ford Ranger XL
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 91 Times in 72 Posts
That's kind of what I thought. I was just musing more than anything. Keeps me thinking outside the box.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 10:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
justme1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ff
Posts: 459
Thanks: 59
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
Yes and No. Ive never seen one hung from a gear box but have seen it set to yoke of the drive shaft.
It is more efficient than you think driven by the weight of the rotating assemblies there is negligable resistance.
Normal mounting will be atop or beside the rear axle.
Added benefits are weight transfer to rear and close proximity to rear mounted Batt.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 01:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Like ChazInMT said You would want it before the transmission. The best solution would be to incorporate the alternator into the fly wheel. The next best thing would be a gear drive. Then probably a toothed belt.

Of course all of this power savings would be dwarfed by just improving the efficiency of the alternator.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 01:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,524 Times in 2,798 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by justme1969 View Post
Normal mounting will be atop or beside the rear axle.
Added benefits are weight transfer to rear and close proximity to rear mounted Batt.
It cleans up the mess under the hood, might be handy to not have the alt in the way if you have to make a repair while on the side of the track.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
ChazInMT (06-25-2013)
Old 06-25-2013, 03:34 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 142

Cinco The Miata - '90 Mazda Miata
Team Mazda
Sports Cars
90 day: 36.13 mpg (US)

Oscar Wilde - '02 Honda Metropolitan
Motorcycle
90 day: 94.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
An alternator connected to the driveshaft would continue to charge the battery (at a cost to coasting distance) during EOC.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AntiochOG For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (06-26-2013)
Old 06-25-2013, 03:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,524 Times in 2,798 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntiochOG View Post
An alternator connected to the driveshaft would continue to charge the battery (at a cost to coasting distance) during EOC.
I think it would solve part of the problem of EOCing and having the lights on (at night), engine off and running down the battery.

So long as you are using a rear wheel drive vehicle.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com