Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-17-2014, 02:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Irvine
Posts: 54
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
Hypermiling tech that damages car parts

There are some techniques I think are a bad idea:

- forced autostop because it wears-out the ignition switch
- to neutral & then back in gear, because it wears-out the clutch faster
- "death turns" that make tires squeal & lose rubber

I prefer not to waste money repairing stuff.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theaveng For This Useful Post:
CargoBoatTails (08-17-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-17-2014, 02:48 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Going to neutral and back does not wear the clutch, at all.

Death turns are fun! That alone is worth the money in rubber
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
chumly (08-23-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 02:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
1. Do you mean starting and stopping when at a light? Idling wears down engine parts, so I'd regard that as a trade-off.

But if you mean "automatic" stop and start... cars with this have stronger starter motors, or, in the case of Mazda, prime the engine to fire so you don't actually need to crank it very hard. Restarting a hot engine is not stressful on parts.

2. It doesn't. Contrawise, you can always shove it into neutral and back into gear without using the clutch at all...

3. Death turns are fu... oh, it's been said already.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
whatmaycome14 (08-24-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 02:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theaveng View Post
There are some techniques I think are a bad idea:

- forced autostop because it wears-out the ignition switch
- to neutral & then back in gear, because it wears-out the clutch faster
- "death turns" that make tires squeal & lose rubber

I prefer not to waste money repairing stuff.
Whatever.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Cobb (08-17-2014), deejaaa (08-18-2014), mcrews (08-24-2014), PaleMelanesian (08-28-2014), whatmaycome14 (08-24-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 02:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theaveng View Post
There are some techniques I think are a bad idea:

- forced autostop because it wears-out the ignition switch
- to neutral & then back in gear, because it wears-out the clutch faster
- "death turns" that make tires squeal & lose rubber

I prefer not to waste money repairing stuff.
1. Uhh, I have never heard of anyone on this site claim they have had to replace their ignition due to turning off their car.
2. How did you come to this conclusion exactly? To my knowledge you have to press the clutch in a scenario where you would shift from gear, into neutral then back into gear, and if your talking about doing it for EOC, I bump start using my clutch and then release. Don't see how that adds any extra wear and tear.
3. Maybe so but that's what warranties are for. Wear them out sooner than guarantee runs out and no big deal .
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-24-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 04:25 AM   #6 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
My "money saved" already exeeds the cost of buying the car.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
dirtydave (08-18-2014), jedi_sol (08-20-2014), mcrews (08-24-2014), MetroMPG (08-17-2014), PaleMelanesian (08-28-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 06:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
Wha... can death turns boost economy in any way?
Never thought about that, I've been missing out on all the fun
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
Cobb (08-17-2014), dirtydave (08-18-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 06:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
If you lose speed to tire squeal, you're wasting gas.

Actually, I don't recall any threads suggesting "death turns"... (which are not necessarily the same as taking the racing line)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-17-2014)
Old 08-17-2014, 07:52 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
My concern was fouling plugs when I use to drive in the city as my engine never reached operating temperature. It hovered around 154 f degrees. I EOC and FAS. Previously I had over 60 thousand miles of highway, so excessive wear didnt concern me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2014, 08:10 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
cowmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,659

Princess Carriage - '20 Ford Explorer Limited

Silver - '22 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT w/tow pkg
Maverick Hybrids
90 day: 41.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 128
Thanked 764 Times in 461 Posts
Quote:
If you lose speed to tire squeal, you're wasting gas.
There's one turn on my commute that's a sharp left at the bottom of a long, winding hill.

I sometimes squeal the tires on that turn due to the built-up speed of coasting the long hill, but since my engine is off when I hit the turn, and has already been off for over half a mile at that point, and stays off another hundred yards after the turn, I'm not really wasting any gas lol!

__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cowmeat For This Useful Post:
dirtydave (08-18-2014), PaleMelanesian (08-28-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com