Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2012, 02:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
serp belt delete = only 2.5 hp on dyno

1998 saturn sc2

weighs 2400 lbs 1.9L engine

please see my thread. I considered deleting my alternator and power steering pump and putting in a pair of 100ah deep cycle batteries and a manual rack.

but the saturn guys responded that with the entire serp belt removed the dyno registered only 2.5hp increase.

if there is only a 2.5 hp increase how much could this save on fuel economy?

here we say that alt delete is 10% gain alone, and the ps pump should add to that. but how can that be possible if the saturn guys say its only 2.5 hp on the dyno and that means no alt, ps pump , water pump at all???

see my thread swap to manual steering rack - SaturnFans Forums

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-18-2012, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Well if you were, say, using 15hp on the highway 2.5hp would be 17% of that. After some efficiency loss due to decreased load you'd be expecting to save about 11% fuel.

But the power saved might be less that 2.5hp at lower revs.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
Ryland (03-18-2012)
Old 03-18-2012, 04:39 PM   #3 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,469

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Exactly what Jakob said. You aren't running your Saturn at 100% power all the time. If you were, you might get only a 2% increase in MPG. Typical highway cruising speeds in a typical car require 15-20hp, in which case 2.5hp becomes a much more significant portion of the total power production.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 05:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
BUT, that 2.5 hp would be stolen all of the time. I would say that idling would be just as impacted as highway mileage. I don't know the exact hp figures, but when my car is idling, the engine load is 10-17% compared to 50-70% at highway cruise.

Then again, I think a lot of people here shut off their engines rather than idle, so that might not have as great of an impact.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com