Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2012, 11:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
XKCD Interesting Factoid

I found this funny thing on the xkcd.com web site Written by Randall Munroe and it is Okay to copy into here. (XKCD Copyright Info)
My take away on this is that it is astounding that such a small amount of fuel squirts us around to where ever we're going.



I have to say—from a dimensional analysis standpoint, ”poops” is one of the strangest units I’ve ever tried to cancel in an equation. But there’s another case of odd unit cancellation, common in everyday life, which is—in a way—even weirder: Gas mileage.

In the US, we measure fuel economy in miles/gallon—which could just as easily be written as gallons/mile. (This reciprocal form has some advantages. It’s popular in Europe, where it’s expressed as liters per 100 kilometers.)

But regardless of which units you use, there’s something strange going on here. Miles are units of length, and gallons are volume—which is length³. So gallons/mile is length³/length. That’s just length².

Gas mileage is measured in square meters.

You can even plug it into Wolfram|Alpha, and it’ll tell you that 23.5 MPG is 0.1 square millimeters (roughly the area of two pixels on a computer screen).

Unit cancellation is weird.

Ok, so what’s the physical interpretation of that number? Is there one?

It turns out there is! If you took all the gas you burned on a trip and stretched it out into a thin tube along your route, 0.1 square millimeters would be the cross-sectional area of that tube.



Here's the complete XKCD page.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
niky (09-14-2012), Ryland (09-12-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-12-2012, 01:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
Very interesting. I will be giving my fuel economy figures in terms of mm^2 from now on :P

How efficient does my car need to be to achieve tubes that are as thin as a strand of hair?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2012, 02:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Very interesting. I will be giving my fuel economy figures in terms of mm^2 from now on :P

How efficient does my car need to be to achieve tubes that are as thin as a strand of hair?
According to Wikipedia, human hair can be 17 to 180 micrometers in diameter. So based on that, I figured you'd need to get between about 90 to 10,000 MPG depending on the color of, and location harvested, of the strand of hair you are using.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (09-12-2012), Ryland (09-12-2012)
Old 09-13-2012, 11:43 AM   #4 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,691

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,268
Thanked 721 Times in 458 Posts
Frontal area is also measured in sq. meters, so maybe the ratio of the two numbers would mean something? Like who gets the best FE per unit of FA.
Or maybe it's a constant, an important building block of the physics of the Universe?
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2012, 10:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 671

Trigger - '07 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Mustang
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.76 mpg (US)

Big Red (retired) - '89 Ford F-250 4wd Custom
90 day: 18.13 mpg (US)

Big Red II - '13 Ford F-150 FX4
Pickups
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 163
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
That's an interesting way of expressing fuel economy. My Mustang has a lifetime average of .07968 mm^2, or .0063" diameter - just over twice the diameter of an average human (scalp) hair.
mm^2 = (liters/100km)/100.
The amount of energy contained in petroleum hydrocarbons is quite impressive.
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!



Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.

Last edited by Mustang Dave; 09-13-2012 at 10:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 08:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
I saw that comic this morning, and at first I was: "funny", then... "what?" then... oooh... that's pretty logical. This one was almost as awesome as the half-empty glass.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
Frontal area is also measured in sq. meters, so maybe the ratio of the two numbers would mean something? Like who gets the best FE per unit of FA.
Or maybe it's a constant, an important building block of the physics of the Universe?
It would be interesting to find out what the theoretical maximum you could get for every square meter of frontal surface area is, and if there is a linear relationship.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 09:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
Super Lurker!
 
Slow_s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 88

Rusty - '88 Chevrolet S10 base
90 day: 23.72 mpg (US)

Doc - '08 Honda Civic EX-L
90 day: 29.6 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
That really is a pretty cool way of looking at fuel economy. Oh and thanks for killing like an hour of my time with that... because of course I had to go back and see all of the other "what if" questions that were asked. The first one was absolutely hilarious BTW.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com