Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2010, 07:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: colorado
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
vaccum road results

this is my first post.(had this post in instrumentation but didn't get muich of a response) . don't know why i am interested in this stuff. i had a
toyota previa; it got the same mileage whether i dogged it or flogged it: 21 mpg on the highway.

My current Car is a 95 infiniti g20 with automatic trans. obd1 so i can't use one of the fancy gauges. i ran the tube for the gauge
with the hood release cable, then under the plastic wheel well liner then down and up into the eng. compartment.

the gauge reads 20-0 in driving. i figure that is about right as i am at
5000' and one is to lose an in. vacuum for every 1000' above sea level.

i am getting about 10" at idle in gear (unfortunately i have an automatic
trans.). that increase to about 14" in N.

usually for optimal economy one is to shift up at about 2k rpm. that sure doesn't appear to be the case with this car.

while cruising at 50 mph with the cruise control on flat ground i pull about
10" in overdrive. when i shift the button to go out of overdrive the vacuum
level increases to about 14". This is also true at 65 mph and to a lesser
extent even at 75 mph!

I am informed that the gear is not locked mechanically until one is in overdrive, and that one will always have hydraulic losses in any other gear.
so it seems that overdrive would be the way to go.

so it appears that these engines have less of a load on them when revving
high. I do not want to cruise in 3rd on acct. of engine noise and wear, but
it sure looks to me that in order to save gas one should almost avoid overdrive unless going very fast. I am very surprised.

comments?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-20-2010, 07:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
My olds only reads 20" at idle. It will drop to 2" on a steep hill and then down shift. It reads 20-21" while coasting and reads about 15" on cold start. If I hit the gas it goes right to 0 and stays there until I let off. I have touched 40 mpg and it has plenty of power, so I assume my readings are normal, so yours should be ok.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2010, 07:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,632

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
I think you have to abandon the idea that more vacuum means better efficiency, it's only true for some special cases, and those have very little to do with actual driving.

I suggest reading the threads about BSFC-charts as a start.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2010, 06:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Monterey, KY
Posts: 45

The Odyssey - '98 Honda Odyssey
90 day: 24.45 mpg (US)

The Civic - '98 Honda Civic DX
90 day: 32.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
You mentioned that you can't use a Scanguage because of the OBD1, perhaps you could use an MPGuino? They are designed to work with any fuel injected car, including yours.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 05:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Do a search for engine efficiency curves, see if you can find one for your vehicle. Low load/high RPM means you are using more gasoline (efficiency is lower). Since you use the same power to travel at the same speed, you want to be toward the center of the efficiency curve. Higher load is ok, since for most cars ~70% load at 2,000 rpm is where peak engine efficiency is. This is why pulse and glide works.
I echo KY's suggestion for using an MPGuino. They work great. Mine isn't spot on, but it gives a real good idea of what is actually happening.
For me, at 45 mph in 5th I get about 10 mpg better than in 4th. You have a different car, so you will have different results, but they should trend the same.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2010, 07:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
While vacuum might not be true indicator for highest mpg , 14" at idle in N seems way low . It should be in high teens with slightly higher idle speed (something like 17-21"@1500-2000 ).
Those numbers seem low to me for condition you indicate .
Might have retarded timing or vacuum leaks .

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
vaccum road results mor2bz Instrumentation 14 02-01-2011 10:01 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com