Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2011, 08:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
How to pick best set of free tires for VX rims?

I have wound up with 2 sets of 175/70/13s, and want to mount one set on my Civic VX rims. I would rather some 155s, but like the title states these were free so they will do for now. One set are Kuhmos, and the other are Michelins. They both have about 70% tread left on them, so I figured I would try to decide based on the Treadwear/Traction/Temperature ratings on the sidewall. From what I understand, the higher the Treadwear rating, the longer the tire will last, so therefore it should be the hardest rubber compound and lowest rolling resistance? Would the tire with the lower Traction rating also be the better choice for LLR, as worse traction would mean lower resistance? Can anyone shed some light on which rating will affect rolling resistance the most? Thanks.

__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-31-2011, 03:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Musician w/ Light Wallet
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 47

SeaBiscuit - '98 Honda Civic DX Hatch
Team Honda
90 day: 39.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
From what I understand, the higher the Treadwear rating, the longer the tire will last, so therefore it should be the hardest rubber compound and lowest rolling resistance?
This is not necessarily true, as I have heard that different companies have different ways to rate tread wear. Couldn't hurt to pick the highest one though. Also, there is more that factors into rolling resistance than just tread wear rating, however that is one factor.

Quote:
Would the tire with the lower Traction rating also be the better choice for LLR, as worse traction would mean lower resistance?
Again, not necessarily. You can be sure, though, that the tire with the lowest traction rating is less safe than the tire with higher traction rating. And again, less traction doesn't always mean less rolling resistance.

All in all, if neither of the tires are advertised as being a "low-rolling-resistance tire," then just go for whichever one you think would be the safest or last the longest. As a side note, you'd probably get better gas mileage with a tire rated at a high max sidewall air pressure (psi). So, if one is 44 and the other is 36, I would pick the 44.

Hope this helps,
JMac
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JMac For This Useful Post:
War_Wagon (03-31-2011)
Old 03-31-2011, 03:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
The first thing to do is elimnate any tire with a puncture or a repair. Those would be suspect.

Then look at the date codes. If you want to know how to read a date code:

Barry's Tire Tech

Completely elimnate any tire older than 6 years.

Then look at what you have left. It would be best to have 4 tires that are the same make and model regardless of the rolling resistance. Safety should come first.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
War_Wagon (03-31-2011)
Old 03-31-2011, 04:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Thanks for the info on the date codes Capri, I didn't know that was there. I guess I'll just stick with the highest sidewall psi like JMac suggested. Though I'll probably go with the Michelins anyway, I used those Kuhmos a few years ago with 44 psi in them and they were pretty scary in the rain, so I'll try out the other ones.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2011, 04:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If I had to replace all my tires that are over 6 years old I'd have to buy about 100 of 'em.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Christ (03-31-2011), Gasoline Fumes (04-01-2011)
Old 04-02-2011, 06:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: shreveport la
Posts: 18

eco fighter - '92 honda civic hatch cx
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
go with the kumhos. ive run those for years on all my honda except for track cars. they last awhile. as long as you dont have alignment problems. michelins are over priced and rated. but u did say they were free.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com