Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2017, 08:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,393

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,189
Thanked 4,378 Times in 3,353 Posts
Physics Question

I often have physics questions but fail to explore them before I forget.

Driving home I started thinking about heat generation on spacecraft reentry vehicles. The Gemini and Apollo reentry vehicles used ablative heat shields to deflect and dissipate heat. The shuttle used tiles to insulate against the heat. I don't know what strategies are used in current reentry vehicles.

My question is, what is the primary cause of heating on the surface of the reentry vehicle? We know that compressing air increases the temperature of it, but I've heard that air friction on the surface is what causes the extreme temperatures. Which action is most responsible for heating the surface of the object? How much does air compression contribute to heating, if at all? Are there other significant sources of heating that I'm not thinking of?

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-08-2017, 12:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,691

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,268
Thanked 721 Times in 458 Posts
It's mostly the friction: The spacecraft is going VERY fast (appr 30k km/h) when reentering the atmosphere, so that is the relative speed with which air molecules are hitting the surface. I won't go into equations on how much heat energy each collision produces, but as the craft falls deeper into the atmosphere it becomes denser, so there are more and more collisions.

Friction is the main way for the multi-ton spacecraft to slow down (from 30k to ~200 km/h), and that braking energy is focused on a relatively small surface area. A parachute is used only towards the end of the fall.

I found this on the temperatures that spaceships experience during reentry:
What are the top temperatures occurring during reentry?
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (04-09-2017), t vago (04-10-2017), Xist (08-17-2017)
Old 04-08-2017, 12:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
It's mostly the friction: The spacecraft is going VERY fast (appr 30k km/h) when reentering the atmosphere, so that is the relative speed with which air molecules are hitting the surface. I won't go into equations on how much heat energy each collision produces, but as the craft falls deeper into the atmosphere it becomes denser, so there are more and more collisions.
Actually, adiabatic compression heats up the skin of the re-entering vehicle. Consider that the re-entering vehicle initially enters the atmosphere at some 25 times the speed of sound. The shock wave generated is actually a wave of compressed air that is adiabatically compressed.

Requesting an in depth explanation of heat created during atmospheric reentry
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
Fingie (04-10-2017), Piwoslaw (04-08-2017), redpoint5 (04-09-2017)
Old 04-10-2017, 12:12 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Logically, the nose and leading edge heat more than the rest, while it's all subject to skin friction.

Compression wins.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
t vago (04-10-2017)
Old 04-10-2017, 12:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
I think it is both compression and friction - compressed air has greater friction with the space ship. And the greater friction between the molecules that make up the air, is what heats it up.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
freebeard (04-10-2017)
Old 04-10-2017, 10:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Inter-molecular spacing — win-win!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com