![]() |
Ultragauge DFCO observations
I have had erratic results from tanks in which I used DFCO extensively, so I reset my displays to allow me to observe both the instant FE reading and the primary O2 sensor. The FE readings are, of course, a calculation by the UG, while the Primary O2 reading is the voltage coming from a dedicated sensor. The sensor reading would have to be a better indicator of DFCO than the UG calculation.
Results: the UG will read 999.99 mpg almost anytime you have it in gear and release the throttle but the O2 sensor often will still indicate fuel being burned. This is sometimes quite a lot of fuel, it would seem. In third gear descending a hill for 10 seconds with a thoroughly warmed engine, the UG showed 999.99 instant MPG while the O2 readings was .6 volts, slowly sliding down to 0.135 volts and then 0.015 volts. Very lean... but not "cut off" ... |
Quote:
Does the .015 reading indicate fuel passing through, or fuel still left in the line? |
Quote:
|
I don't know. I'm not sure how that works, but am curious.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can say for myself that it does save gasoline, I just averaged over 37 MPG on my last trip cycle from lots of in gear coasting and other techniques in my Camry :) I hope this helps! -SC |
o2 sensor & lean burn
According to the manual:
Quote:
|
The lower the O2 sensor voltage, the more lean the car is. I saw a graph at one point but can't remember where I saw it. 0.600-0.855 is normal range though.
[Edit]: I don't have experience with DFCO as I can't get my UG to detect when my insight is in DFCO, and I highly doubt the insight doesn't have it. |
There's a good explanation here, the best air to fuel (atf) ratio for economy being 16:1, which they say is the target for closed loop operation.
http://www.endtuning.com/images/airfuel.jpg |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com