Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2008, 04:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 33

Baz - '93 106
90 day: 62.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
100+ hypermilling / ecodriving tips article

There's a point on it, if anyone could clarify for me, I'd like to take up.

Quote:
43) The most efficient way to slow down

When you *have* to slow down, here's an approximate heirarchy of methods, from best to worst.

1) coasting in neutral, engine off (ie. roll to a stop);
2) coasting in neutral, engine idling;
3) regenerative coasting (hybrid vehicles)
4) regenerative braking (hybrid vehicles)
5) coasting in "deceleration fuel cut-off" mode (in gear, above a certain engine RPM)
6) conventional friction braking (non-hybrid or hybrid)

Choosing the right method depends on traffic conditions (following vehicles) and how quickly you need to stop.
#5, I would think should be placed at #2, and safer/better than #1. It's my understanding that whilst coasting in gear in a modern injection engine (although this could perhaps just be a modern diesel?), the ICE stops consuming fuel, and runs off the kinetic energy you have consumed. Whereas, if you go into neutral, your engine will still be ticking over, at say 800rpm, and consuming fuel. The only reason I can see that #2 would be higher is because you can coast for longer like that, although that means you don't stop as quickly, which of course equates to energy not lost, but when you're idling, you're still burning fuel. Have I overlooked something major? Or perhaps American petrol engines are different?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


Goal: 3L/100KM
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 07:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,678

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
You are correct in assuming that #5 slows you down much faster. Since we are talking about distance per amount of fuel used, #2 is better overall since you do not loose speed very fast. Therefore, your fuel use increases, but the distance you travel greatly increases.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 10:28 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,479

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 74.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 148
Thanked 138 Times in 97 Posts
The difference in coasting distance is huge. You're absolutely correct about it still consuming fuel. I'd say it depends on your speed. If you're going 55mph or more, coasting at idle isn't much different than with the engine off. If you're going 5mph, you're almost idling at a stop, which gives you zero mpg. As always, "it depends".


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
100+ hypermiling / ecodriving tips & tactics MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 371 05-16-2012 01:40 PM
Several tips on improving MPG ( article ) Cd Aerodynamics 1 03-28-2008 08:04 PM
Article: women use "trip chaining" ecodriving tactic more than men MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 2 12-11-2007 01:34 PM
Article: Tips tested by Edmunds Lazarus Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 2 12-03-2007 10:10 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com