Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-02-2011, 03:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 25
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
95 civic drag race car project

So after many tries to stay competitive with all the faster car, I started to look at what I may be doing wrong.

Horse power was about the same at others and im not a bad driver either.

So my 2000 honda civic that I been racing the last 5-6 years, I decided to put it aside for now and get a 95 civic h/b.

The new car came with cage and race ready, but I want to take it a step further and make it more aerodynamic so hopefully I can get ahead of the competition.

I looked in the drag coefficient and compared the two cars to see how much power it looses at different speeds. The best I could get my 2000 civic is as low CD as the 95 civic.

Cant' post pics yet, so I have to wait until after the next few posts.

Stefan


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 03:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 25
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Taken in consideration the cars CD and frontal area I made a graph of how much hp a car looses at different mph.
__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 03:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 25
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Next step and thats where hopefully everyone here comes in, is to help me decide what mods are the best improving CD in the 95 civic.

Front bumper block off
Rear kammback
Under body full flat panels
__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 03:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 25
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Here is what I been testing on my homemade wind tunnel.

Stock spoiler on the 2000 civic h/b



Kamm back on the 2000 civic h/b



And the new race car



And the graph of the cars and hp loss

__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onefstek For This Useful Post:
3dplane (12-15-2011), Cd (12-03-2011), Sven7 (12-02-2011)
Old 12-02-2011, 03:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Schwinning!
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 990

The Anal Probe - '92 Probe GL
Team Ford
90 day: 35.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 310
Thanked 237 Times in 133 Posts
Does the car have a smooth belly pan? That would be a very important upgrade to make. You could even secure it with hood pins or something for easy removal.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
Nothing fell off so that is good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 04:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wauseon, OH (Toledo)
Posts: 383

The TC - '88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
90 day: 28.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Just how fast is this car? I noticed the ITB's sticking out of the hood so im guessing its pretty well built.
__________________
BP+T/G5MR swapped '93 Festiva
Escort GT Block, Garrett T3 50trim, A/R .42/.48
SRT-4 Intercooler
---Bests with BP+T---
1/4 mile ET - 12.99
1/4 mile MPH - 109.8
Best MPG - 36.8
Average MPG - 31 (over 11,500 miles)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 04:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 25
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Car is built, motor makes about 350 whp all motor. In the 2000 civic I ran a 10.7 sec 1/4 mile @ 126 mph. All other cars are running about 130 mph.

Car will have a belly pan all the way, working of the right angle and length of the kamm back. Also thinking of a scoop above the itb's so it will get air from in front of the bumper where there is more air pressure.

Stefan
__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 02:12 AM   #8 (permalink)
Schwinning!
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 990

The Anal Probe - '92 Probe GL
Team Ford
90 day: 35.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 310
Thanked 237 Times in 133 Posts
Damn, nice work on the sub 11 sec.

Kammback here ya go

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
Nothing fell off so that is good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 09:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: houston
Posts: 358

Black Knight - '94 Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 61.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 25 Posts
from the pic it looks like you got some interior you can still remove. and remover the door glass and replace it with the netting. also what class are you running in so i can look up those rules....

I would also get that front end lower or go get some type of chin spoiler put on like some garden edging.

Last edited by deathtrain; 12-03-2011 at 09:38 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2011, 09:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 579

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefstek View Post
Also thinking of a scoop above the itb's so it will get air from in front of the bumper where there is more air pressure.
The way they are now the TBs look like they are in the low pressure area.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com