Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2008, 08:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Aerodynamics Seminar #3 - by Phil Knox

This post was originally written by Phil Knox (aerohead), and it first appeared on the MaxMPG group. Phil has done a lot of work educating the masses about the critical role aerodynamics play in efficiency, and has spurred many in the DIY crowd to take matters into their own hands.

This is the third in a series which I'm reproducing here with permission.


Go to: Aerodynamics Seminar Index

---

Aerodynamics Seminar # 3 - by Phil Knox

I've got about 50 minutes so I'll toss out some miscelania (sp?).

We've discussed that aero drag is defined by the size (frontal area) and shape (drag coefficient). At any speed considered,a change to either the size of a vehicle or its drag coefficient would alter its performance.

I'd like everyone to be acquainted with the significance speed (velocity) plays with drag, as it varies geometrically with speed, not arithmetically. If you double your speed, the power your powerplant must produce to overcome air drag does not double, it goes up eight times ( 8x !).

How can this be? Okay,consider that you hit the air twice as fast, twice as often,and your hitting twice as much of it. So your velocity affects the air in three ways,or VxVxV ( V cubed ).

In the formula for aerodynamic horsepower, which I'll post as a photograph ( because I don't know how to type it on this computer), you'll be considering AIR DENSITY,VELOCITY,FRONTAL AREA, Cd,to arrive at HP for a given speed.

The critical thing to remember is that speed costs money. A NASCAR race car can travel 50-mph with 15 horsepower. At race speeds,to go from 195 mph to 196 mph will take an additional horsepower just for a 1 mph increase in speed.

And to go back to Sean's question about those longitudinal fins on the tops of the race cars, They are "air fences".Their job comes to play if the driver gets the car sideways. At the speeds NASCAR races at,the cars become crude wings and will fly off the race track.The fences spoil the flow over the car,spoil the lift,and hopefully keep the racecar earthbound where the driver has some chance for control.

Also,at 200 mph,the NASCARS have much reserve power at 800-plus horsepower. The excess is used for passing acceleration. And at 195-200 mph, mileage for the MONTE CARLOs and TAURUS falls from 30-mpg to 4-mpg. A trip in a NASCAR today from Dallas to Austin,Texas at race speed would cost $187.00 in fuel.The same trip in the same cars at the posted speed limit would be $25.00. Again,speed costs money.

So what we're playing with is to fool the air into thinking our vehicle is either smaller or sleeker. Alex Tremulis said that the early aerodynamic pioneers had done all the "pick and shovel" work for us,and we're down to the details and refinement now. By looking back at their work,we can benefit from their lifes work.

John Gilkison mentioned KAMM and the ZEPPELIN WERKS,and in the next installment I hope to touch on some of these experts of their day and the enormous contribitions of which we are the beneficiary of there work.If we choose to do so.

Design obsolescence is a marketing construct, which has interfered with the natural technological evolution of ground transport. Some current offerings give us starting points from which to accentuate,modify,and approach the forms which might have existed,had certain influences not excercised power in the market.

'til next time, low drag to you all,and may we drill the sky for fuel. See ya, Phil.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-14-2009, 04:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 460

WonderWagon - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 51.52 mpg (US)

DaBluOne - '99 Ford Escort SE
90 day: 48.97 mpg (US)

DaRedOne - '99 Ford Escort ZX2 Hot
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
The picture showing "formula for aerodynamic horsepower" was lost when this got moved to a new thread.
Here's one from Wikipedia.

Horsepower required to overcome aerodynamic drag -

Quote:
is the force of drag,
is the density of the fluid (Note that for the Earth's atmosphere, the density can be found using the barometric formula. It is 1.293 kg/m3 at 0 °C and 1 atmosphere.),
is the speed of the object relative to the fluid,
is the reference area,
is the drag coefficient (a dimensionless parameter, e.g. 0.25 to 0.45 for a car), and
is the unit vector indicating the direction of the velocity (the negative sign indicating the drag is opposite to that of velocity).
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 08:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Don't you end up using 4x as much fuel at 2x the speed, because one of those 2x is cancelled out by getting to your destination in 1/2x the time?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 01:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 460

WonderWagon - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 51.52 mpg (US)

DaBluOne - '99 Ford Escort SE
90 day: 48.97 mpg (US)

DaRedOne - '99 Ford Escort ZX2 Hot
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Remember he's talking about how much additional HP is required to overcome drag - not average fuel economy.

Less time burning fuel applies but, drag is only one factor. Parasitic losses in the engine, drive train and suspension go up as well - just not as fast as drag losses. So 2x speed (in same gear) means MORE than 4x fuel consumed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 07:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
in 1/2x the time

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
Don't you end up using 4x as much fuel at 2x the speed, because one of those 2x is cancelled out by getting to your destination in 1/2x the time?
We have to consider each vehicle on a case-specific basis, along with it's BSFC map under all operating regimes and changes to rolling resistance and any effects of road conditions,grades,temps,wind,etc.-------------------- For the aero portion only,doubling the velocity increases the road load power requirement by a factor of eight.The rolling resistance will not vary the same way.So you've got to calculate the total road load for any given speed.------------------- Using my truck for an example,at say 40 MPH you'd see low 40s mpg,and then pushing it to a steady 80 mph she falls off to around 30mpg.----------------- At the low speed the truck is mainly battling rolling resistance with only marginal air drag.At 80 mph,about 80% of available engine power is being absorbed by aero drag.--------------------- Every individual has to way out the implications of the higher velocity.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2021, 10:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Radium Springs, NM
Posts: 465

Ford XLT Naked - '14 Ford F-150 XLT
90 day: 15.04 mpg (US)

Ford G-4 with Stinger - '14 Ford F-150 4X4 Super Crew XLT
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Ford Stealth G-4 - '14 Ford F-150 4X4 Super Crew XLT
90 day: 18.06 mpg (US)

XLT Towing Keystone 5th wheel trailer - '14 Ford Keystone 5th Wheel XLT
90 day: 9.03 mpg (US)

Trip 2015 C Max Energi - '15 Ford C Max Energi SWP
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)

Local 120 volt 2015 C-Max Energi - '15 Ford C-Max Energy SEL
90 day: 55.65 mpg (US)

Local 240 volt 2015 C-Max Energi - '15 Ford C Max Energi SLE
90 day: 57.63 mpg (US)

Energi Combined - '15 C Max Energi Leather
90 day: 51.2 mpg (US)

MoonDust for Travel - '19 Chevrolet Bolt LT
90 day: 123.11 mpg (US)

MoonDust 3 with 90% CE - '19 Chevy Bolt LT
90 day: 127.57 mpg (US)

Ecopia IV - '19 Chevy Bolt Lt
90 day: 126.39 mpg (US)

Ecopia IV Trip Log - '19 Chevy Bolt LT
90 day: 121.01 mpg (US)

Rate Rider Chevy Bolt - '19 Chevrolet Bolt LT-2
90 day: 123.16 mpg (US)

Teal Force One - '24 Hyundai Ioniq 5 SEL
90 day: 93.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 528 Times in 278 Posts
For Phil Knox, a video by Bjorn showing watt hours per kilometer with a regular cargo box and then he tested one that was designed to mount backwards and it showed a 9% drop in energy consumption. P.S. it was also quieter. This is what I told him was better some years ago but he just only now got around to testing it. Apparently it is illegal to mount them backwards unless they are specifically manufactured to do so with the mounting hardware.

https://youtu.be/Z0P6i1YsgII
__________________




  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerostealth For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-03-2021)
Old 03-03-2021, 11:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
backwards

So we're finally catching up to WW-II technology.
Anyone with Hoerner's book, ' Aerodynamic Drag,' will already be familiar with the canopies and blisters which are the 'proper' application of the streamlined form.
Some aircraft which demonstrate the technology are:
* Grumman AF-2W submarine hunter
* Douglas EA-1 Skyraider AEW
* Boeing PB-1W
* Fairey ( Westland ) Gannet AEW Mk 3
* Tupolev Tu-16 ' Badger-C '
* Tupolev Tu-142 'Bear/ AEW
* Myasishchev M-4 ' Bison '
* British Aerospace Nimrod
* Sikorsky S-70/ SH-60 B Seahawk
* Grumman E-1 ( WF-2 'Willy Fudd' ) Tracer
* Scaled Composites Proteus/ Angel Technologies HALO
* Boeing 737 800 dorsal WIFI fairing
* Carlisle ARINC 791 SATCOM fairing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* General Motors Proving Grounds towed-dynamometers
Don't let the past pass you by!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 12:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 388
Thanks: 64
Thanked 162 Times in 137 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post

A NASCAR race car can travel 50-mph with 15 horsepower. At race speeds,to go from 195 mph to 196 mph will take an additional horsepower just for a 1 mph increase in speed.
You lost me.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j-c-c For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-10-2021)
Old 03-10-2021, 10:17 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
lost me

Quote:
Originally Posted by j-c-c View Post
You lost me.
If you take the aerodynamic drag and rolling-resistance road-load horsepower requirement at 50-mph, add the powertrain loss, and engine accessory losses, you find that 15-brake-horsepower will be adequate to maintain the 50-mph velocity.
On a long, NASCAR superspeedway, like Daytona, Florida, the rolling-resistance drag power requirements will increase arithmetically with speed, while aerodynamic drag-related power requirements increase geometrically, as the cube of the velocity.
Passing, without a draft can easily require an additional horsepower / mph at the velocities they run at.
The 2021 Hennessey Venom 5 is allowing 1,850-horsepower for the 311- mph rated top speed.
At the Indianapolis 500, Dalara race cars have only 55-miles range per tank of fuel. Real range anxiety!

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th generation civic hatchback - improving aerodynamics AndrewJ Aerodynamics 396 06-13-2022 01:51 PM
Aerodynamics Seminar #2 - by Phil Knox MetroMPG Aerodynamics 2 05-10-2013 05:34 PM
Aerodynamics Seminar #1 - by Phil Knox MetroMPG Aerodynamics 7 08-08-2012 06:00 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com