Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2008, 04:05 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 451

Wicked Wanda - '99 VW Beetle GLS
90 day: 29.59 mpg (US)

Green Monster - '99 Ford Explorer Sport
90 day: 16.73 mpg (US)

Dad's Taxi - '99 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 24.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
Bingo. Using the traction bar frame to support a boat tail would more than pay for any penalty imposed by the slightly extra weight of the boat tail material. Since the front wheels don't have to turn much in a drag race application, may as well cover them.

The nose cone/bumper cover of that red car are pretty good, but could stand some improvement.

Got undertray? Wheel fairings?

PS: Do the rules require the drag bar to have a wheel on each side, or could you make a presumably lighter drag bar by tapering to just one centerline wheel, perhaps a bit further back? That would make a nice frame for a teardrop boat tail, while still doing its drag bar function.
FWD drag racer have slightly unique needs vs. RWD cars. They need to keep as much weight on the front wheels as they can at all times. The air dams you see on the front of these cars generates enough downforce to put the lower edge almost on the pavement at top speed. There's not enough air going under the car to make an undertray worthwhile. Dragsters and funny cars are usually open on the bottom and it doesn't seem to matter.

A boattail 4-5 feet long would put weight in a place no FWD racer would want it: behind the center of gravity (CG) of the car. Even CF weighs enough that, combined with the leverage, would move the CG toward the rear of the car. The Red racer has probably done as much as you should for a FWD car. Adding a flat panel to smooth the transition of air at the rear of the car probably reduced lift and drag without impacting downforce and CG.

Wheelie bars on FWD are usually spread as far apart as is practical to keep the car as level as possible during launch. If the car were to tilt to one side it would unload one of the front wheels = wheelspin = you lose. I've seen single wheelie bars on dragsters, but full bodied cars usually have 2. Wheelie bars also exist in a disturbed air region behind the car, so aerodynamics is a moot point. They are designed to be as strong and as light as possible.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-31-2008, 04:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: So. IN.
Posts: 188

Blue - '77 Chevy P/U
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
Bingo. Using the traction bar frame to support a boat tail would more than pay for any penalty imposed by the slightly extra weight of the boat tail material. Since the front wheels don't have to turn much in a drag race application, may as well cover them.

The nose cone/bumper cover of that red car are pretty good, but could stand some improvement.

Got undertray? Wheel fairings?

PS: Do the rules require the drag bar to have a wheel on each side, or could you make a presumably lighter drag bar by tapering to just one centerline wheel, perhaps a bit further back? That would make a nice frame for a teardrop boat tail, while still doing its drag bar function.
you have to be able to drive the car around the pits,,into staging lane's etc,,,Can't block the steering with covers

Last edited by COMP; 05-31-2008 at 08:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 04:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
Boattailing the wheelie-bars

Quote:
Originally Posted by trikkonceptz View Post
I understand that the traction bars are efficient in themselves, but what if they were used as a frame for a boat tail? Then they would have function to keep traction plus be integral in cutting the rear end wake of the car.

At this level, we are talking about pieces made out of CF or other very light weight materials. But is there any reaon that a FWD dragster cannot side skirt both front and rear wheels? If you look at the pic I posted, there is no way those wheels turn to any practical degree.
I think drag bikes are doing this one.And at 160-mph,aero is definitely a factor.I know guys with slow cars and they're obsessed with weight reduction as it a game of F= MA.I have an article about a Cadillac Coupe deVille that went through the Texas Chopsaw Massacre at Dallas Int'l Raceway long ago.The guys just kept cutting parts off the Caddy until nothing was left but the frame/wheels/suspension/powertrain/and rollbar.The car ran consecutively faster times,even with the total absence of a body! Nothing like your into.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 08:02 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: So. IN.
Posts: 188

Blue - '77 Chevy P/U
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I think drag bikes are doing this one.And at 160-mph,aero is definitely a factor.I know guys with slow cars and they're obsessed with weight reduction as it a game of F= MA.I have an article about a Cadillac Coupe deVille that went through the Texas Chopsaw Massacre at Dallas Int'l Raceway long ago.The guys just kept cutting parts off the Caddy until nothing was left but the frame/wheels/suspension/powertrain/and rollbar.The car ran consecutively faster times,even with the total absence of a body! Nothing like your into.
less weight drops that ET
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2008, 09:35 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brunswick, Ohio
Posts: 121

Danger Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger Edge 4x4
90 day: 14.52 mpg (US)

Moms car - '05 Ford Freestyle Limited
90 day: 21.92 mpg (US)

Mistress - '10 Harley-Davidson 883 Sportster 883 Iron
90 day: 42.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to meemooer
^^ usually 100lbs is worth a tenth of a second

__________________
Randy
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Phil Knox fleet - 34 years of aeromodding MetroMPG Aerodynamics 46 11-08-2021 10:37 AM
Aeromodding in the 1930's: 38 mpg, 70 mph Model T MetroMPG Aerodynamics 42 05-29-2012 12:08 PM
Aeromodding my pickup = dilemma Chris D. The Lounge 4 05-28-2008 02:39 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com