Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 09:45 PM   #141 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 430

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 35.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
..very nice under pan indeed! I had a 1967 Formula S Barracuda and instantly recognized the basic body design.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 11:49 PM   #142 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 169
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Hehe I had a 67 383 Formula S coupe (not fastback).

10 MPG no matter what you did. Buried the speedo and jammed it against the peg below 0, with a 323 rear axle.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 12:41 AM   #143 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I got poke around the car in '06 (?) when it had the 4 cylinder turbo midget engine. The turbo was as big as a basketball and sat right behind that little slot in the nose. (no radiator, just a ballast tank) I think the engine was dry sump and sat very low. The whole engine bay was sealed off from the ground by the belly pans. What air that there was in the engine bay was used efficiently. For example, there were long thin heat exchangers (for oil?) mounted at the rear corners right by the door gaps. At speed the low pressure at the door gaps would pull air through.

The interior was just nuts. There was no transmission tunnel. The trans just sits right beside the driver. The exhaust is routed through the interior. IIRC the intercooler and plumbing is where the passenger seat would be. The driver's seat has its own roll cage in addition to the car's roll cage.

The exterior is smooth except for a billion Tri-wing fasteners. The wheels even have them!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 10:15 AM   #144 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA
Posts: 1,340

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.91 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 36.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Hi,

I think that most of the time, a blunt nose is best -- because the air "decides" which way it will flow, and this determines the stagnant point.

But, if you use a pointy nose that is as low as possible, then this forces more of the air to go up an over the car -- which can be helpful especially if you do not have a smooth underside.

For example, my rear wheel skirts get pushed outward; I think by the air coming out from under the car, as well as by air on the sides "catching" the bottom edge. OTOH, Chang's CRX HF has a long and low and quite pointy nose, and I think this helps minimize the need for a belly pan.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.vox.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 02:57 PM   #145 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post


Do you really need a ramp or can you just use a huge splitter? This is one of the biggest around. It's all carbon, but the underside is what's cool. The underside is all foam. They put lots of foam under there and the stuff that hangs too low just gets worn away. The result is exactly the correct ground clearance. No math, no guessing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 07:03 PM   #146 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 2,366

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 17.21 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 76 Times in 60 Posts
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 05:24 PM   #147 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 1,728
Thanks: 21
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
photo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Frank,I thought you promised never to publish my photo! It's okay,I've made some changes.It'll be harder to recognize me now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 06:45 PM   #148 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The gentleman in that picture appears to be modified for low drag and downforce. The paint dots must be vortex generators like the dots on a golf ball. Also, notice the slender neck. He's built for speed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2009, 11:56 PM   #149 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 2,366

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 17.21 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 76 Times in 60 Posts
I'm sure that superior aero is the reason they can run like cheetahs!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2009, 12:45 AM   #150 (permalink)
Wanderer
 
Sorrow Six Star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 51

Winona - '86 XT DL
Thanks: 13
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the whole car pic does the "monster's" SX4 more justice if you have played grand turismo you will seee the resemblance to the original "escudo" (read swift metro, lol) car


and one made of legos FTW!


this is the "family" car we own
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment#4-Rooflines( quotes)) ) aerohead Aerodynamics 0 05-24-2008 03:49 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com