Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2008, 11:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Cd and blunt front ends

I'm bringing up an old topic again due to my lack of understanding on something :

How can a car with a flat front end attain the same .Cd as one shaped like a bullet ?

I would guess that due to the increased pressure* at the front of the object with a blunt front end, that the object would have a higher drag.
Apparently this is not the case though.

*( I'm assuming that when air piles up upon itself it creates pressure ... which I again assume creates drag. )

I keep looking back at the Hot Rod Camaro, which had a .201 .Cd using nothing more than a flat piece of metal as a grill block and a small spoiler modification.

It would be hard for us to match that .Cd figure even with our 'jelly bean ' cars, yet these guys did it without even trying ( no belly pan, wheel skirts, extended nose cones / boat tails /..... etc.

The article stated that they tried a huge windshield extention to 'lay back' the angle of the windshield, yet it did nothing to lower the .Cd in the wind tunnel.

Please explain how that this can be.

Perhaps I should contact the folks at the A2 wind tunnel ( the testing took place there ) and ask them these questons.

Wouldn't that be cool if we could get one them onto this forum to answer some of our questions ?


Last edited by Cd; 06-08-2008 at 11:10 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2008, 11:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts




  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
TheDon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Davenport,FL
Posts: 214

Pepper - '87 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 30.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I need to do the coast down test on my brick and let you know what the .cd is...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Just think - the EV1 had a drastic tear drop shape from not only the sides , but the top as well, a full belly pan, no grill opening, wheel skirts ..etc, yet was only slightly sleeker than this old beat up* '79 Camaro.

* Just look at how rough the edges are below the 'bumper'.

I just don't get it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
I need to do the coast down test on my brick and let you know what the .cd is...

If a Lexus ls400 can break .26 and a Lexus LS430 break .25 ... it might be easier than we all would think to make your 'brick' a 'missile'.


Last edited by Cd; 06-08-2008 at 11:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:48 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
The key is attached airflow along the length of the object, or the avoidance of turbulence.

You recall that the optimal aero shape- a falling drop- has a hemisphere for a leading edge, not a bullet. That is how it is for the very subsonic speeds we operate in.

So a blunt leading edge is OK so long as the flow doesn't go turbulent as it transitions to flow along the sides.

Right. Well I meant bullet shaped / egg shaped .... you know ... anything but a flat plate like they have on that Camaro.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
You guys are being harsh, the Gen2 Camaros have a good basic shape. They did quite a bit to the front of that car and probably did a bunch of clean up on the details to get where they are.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 11:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Speaking of falling rain drops and such, in real life, they just look like a blob and rarely take on a teardrop shape.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:00 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
And speaking of the front of that Camaro, it is a 'glass front end with none of the seams, openings, gaps, or even accurate shape of a stocker.
Exactly on the 'glass, there is no headlights, but the stock shape is there. Its like a NASCAR style front.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:01 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Yes, but still flat.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment#4-Rooflines( quotes)) ) aerohead Aerodynamics 0 05-24-2008 02:49 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com