Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModder Blog Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2009, 09:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,414

Vegan Powa! - '91 CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 81 Times in 67 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy Send a message via Skype™ to SVOboy
Do You Love Your Fuel Efficient Clunker?

For those of us that bought fuel efficient vehicles in the first place, it can sting a little bit to know that the people who made bad vehicle choices in the past are getting $4,500 dollars for a new car while we get nothing.Well, worry not. This may be of little consolation, but you can [...]Related posts:
  1. Even With Cheap Gas, We Still Want Fuel Efficient Vehicles
  2. Ford Fusion Hybrid is Surprisingly Fuel Efficient
  3. Canada Kills ecoAUTO Program, Rebates to End for Fuel Efficient Vehicles

More...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 12:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Macon,GA
Posts: 73
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
sigh.......It stings knowing I have ineffecient clunker that doesn't qualify because it's too old.

My other car doesn't qualify because it's too effecient...but I wouldn't let it go any ways.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 01:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
robbiewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boo Town, MD
Posts: 129

Yaris? - '08 Yaris LB
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to robbiewt
What really sucks is that my parent's old mini-van is 1 mpg too high to qualify(according to the EPA).
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 02:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,465
Thanks: 16
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vwbeamer View Post
It stings knowing I have ineffecient clunker that doesn't qualify because it's too old.
But in that case, it's not a clunker, it's a classic car!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 02:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,493

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 42.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 338
Thanked 417 Times in 285 Posts
SVOboy -

I don't mind. If the great swammy, the Stupendous Yappy, had forecasted this 1 year ago, it would have been neat to fork out some bucks and park a clunker in the driveway, only to cash it in a year later.

Lacking that foreknowledge, I don't think I could live with a car that would make me gnash my teeth every time I thought of the MPG. It just doesn't make sense for me as a commuter in Los Angeles.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 12:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,624

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 558
Thanked 689 Times in 490 Posts
All the junk I have laying around and no clunkers that qualify.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 01:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
I'm sure I could find something, but I don't have anything that qualifies that's been registered for a year and insured.

Besides, by the time I got done buying, titling, registering, and insuring another unused vehicle for a year, that $4500 would be more like $3500, best case scenario.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 02:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,624

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 558
Thanked 689 Times in 490 Posts
Yeah, when I first got wind of the program I visited the local dealerships to see if there was anything good for $4500 off. I went away not very impressed. Guess I'll stick with clunkers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 12:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Yeah, when I first got wind of the program I visited the local dealerships to see if there was anything good for $4500 off. I went away not very impressed. Guess I'll stick with clunkers.
Fact is, I've never paid much more than $500 to buy a car/truck and put it on the road.

Saddest part about that is, I've usually either completely trashed them, and got half of my money back at the junkyard, or sold them for more than I paid for them.

Imagine the number of $100 and $200 vehicles I've passed up over the years, and double the price of every one... that's my "potential income" on an ideal lifetime scenario. LOL

Until people started really concerning themselves with fuel economy, there were very few times that I'd have to bid against someone else to get the car that I wanted. Those times, I'd usually let it go, because there would always be another one, probably in better condition than what the dealer has, and the owner is only selling the car to pay for gas or insurance on his/her SUV thingy.

Point: With as many times as I've gotten a year's use out of < $500, and considering the abuse I used to put vehicles through, still getting ~25-30MPG in almost every vehicle I've owned, (barring several larger models), it still just wouldn't be worthwhile to buy a new vehicle, even if it was $4500 off.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 03:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Fact is, I've never paid much more than $500 to buy a car/truck and put it on the road.

Saddest part about that is, I've usually either completely trashed them, and got half of my money back at the junkyard, or sold them for more than I paid for them.

Imagine the number of $100 and $200 vehicles I've passed up over the years, and double the price of every one... that's my "potential income" on an ideal lifetime scenario. LOL

Until people started really concerning themselves with fuel economy, there were very few times that I'd have to bid against someone else to get the car that I wanted. Those times, I'd usually let it go, because there would always be another one, probably in better condition than what the dealer has, and the owner is only selling the car to pay for gas or insurance on his/her SUV thingy.

Point: With as many times as I've gotten a year's use out of < $500, and considering the abuse I used to put vehicles through, still getting ~25-30MPG in almost every vehicle I've owned, (barring several larger models), it still just wouldn't be worthwhile to buy a new vehicle, even if it was $4500 off.
Imagine if marketing got a handle on people like us? I wonder how many hundreds of millions of drivers would revolt worldwide. I spent a fair amount just once...and lost it all in split seconds. It is a sick game, especially as a mechanic trained with discipline. It doesn;t take long to gewt the fat slales out of the way and cologne, and aurora of greatness... I too go for facts, my next one just may be out of a field rotting away...
This year , without a garage, I purchased tools that deem cars impossible...possible.
My $500 goes for several years and the value is a serious gain. I lost just once....and that time my chevelle got stolen.
Education is the millionare...the rest are going to have to lose.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 152 10-27-2011 01:28 PM
Hydrogen Generator Experiment willy57 DIY / How-to 473 03-04-2011 03:29 PM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 19 08-08-2010 10:24 PM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 162 07-18-2010 06:31 PM
Even With Cheap Gas, We Still Want Fuel Efficient Vehicles SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 3 02-23-2009 03:56 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com