Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack (2) Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2009, 10:06 AM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
How narrow is too narrow? Thinking in plan view.

The VW L1 Concept shows to be 1200mm wide, 1143mm tall, and 3813mm long, Cd0.195. (VW 1L Prototype; 1250mm wide, 1 meter tall, 3470mm long, Cd 0.159)

I found these numbers for the Geo Metro.

Wheelbase 2,265 mm (89.2 in) (3-door/Conv.)
2,365 mm (93.1 in) (5-door/Sedan)
Length 3,745 mm (147 in) (3-door/Conv.)
3,845 mm (151.4 in) (5-door)
4,095 mm (161.2 in) (Sedan)
Width 1,575 mm (62.0 in) (3/5-door)
1,590 mm (62.6 in) (Sedan/Conv.)
Height 1,350 mm (53.1 in) (3-Door)
1,380 mm (54 in) (5-door/Sedan)
1,340 mm (52.8 in) (Conv.)

So, it ends up being about the same length as a Metro. The width is 15 inches narrower. Height is 8 inches lower.

I guess the only thing that really matter is how low the Cg (center of gravity) is on the Volkswagen. If they can get it low enough, the car is wide enough.

Aerohead, what kind of handling effects do you get with a low Cg? The L1 has lithium batteries in the nose...so the Cg should already be ahead of the Cp. But I'm curious about the vertical height of the Cg in relation to Cp.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:17 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA
Posts: 1,340

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.91 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 36.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Hi,

I don't think this would be an issue. It might come in handy, actually, in getting past someone turning left.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.vox.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 1,066

Tomos Arrow - '05 Arrow ST
90 day: 101.68 mpg (US)

honda cb125 - '74 CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuti-Car
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
It seems like the wheels of the VW are even closer to the corners and even with that, I've never heard of someone rolling a Metro...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 10:31 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Hi,

I don't think this would be an issue. It might come in handy, actually, in getting past someone turning left.
I didn't even think about that. Good idea!

I think the narrow width will allow the car to take a better 'racing line' around corners. There might even be crazy owners in California that would drive through traffic jams like motorcycles do out there. Attempt at your own risk. heh heh
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 11:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA
Posts: 1,340

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.91 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 36.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Hi,

The main reason that VW did this was to reduce the frontal area -- the Cd is very low, as well; so the CdA is probably better than any road-worthy 2-seat car.

I also like the very tiny side view video mirrors.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.vox.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 51

White 4Runner - '98 4Runner SR5
90 day: 22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I hate when the motorcycles split the traffic at freeway speeds. The DMV site says this about it "Lane splitting by motorcycles is permissible but must be done in a safe and prudent manner." I don't think that splitting the traffic at 50+ MPH is save or prudent, but they do it all the time.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 04:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Hi,

The main reason that VW did this was to reduce the frontal area -- the Cd is very low, as well; so the CdA is probably better than any road-worthy 2-seat car.

I also like the very tiny side view video mirrors.
Of course they did it to lower CdA. They could lower CdA even more if they moved those cameras out of the airflow behind the car. OR they could just mount ONE camera on the roof. (The view is unrestricted up there.) OR they could move the cameras up on the fenders like Japanese cars. (So you could wave to yourself on TV.) OR they could ditch the electronics and use 3 curved rear view mirrors out of a fighter jet cockpit and mount them on the A-post/roof/A-post 'hoop'. Then there is the Isdera Imperator periscope option.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 04:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 2,369

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 17.21 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 76 Times in 60 Posts
Boy did they ever screw it up.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 06:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 485

Zombie Insight - '00 Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 64.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
For vehicles that do not lean during cornering, resistance to rolling over depends only on track width and the height of the center of mass. While the need to seat two abreast limits the width of most compact cars, it's the ratio of track width to CG height that limits the VW 1L and other tandems.



^^ That car needs a boat tail. Also note how they reduced ground clearance to lower the CG.

There are some unconventional approaches that might make for a better tandem car. You could have a faired, outrigger suspension like the Aptera's front, but detaching the wheels from the body raises your CdA, especially in a crosswind. Alternately, you could lean into corners like a bicycle or that new Nissan concept car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 07:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 493

Jeep Offspring - '97 MPV Allsport 2wd
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)

Geeeoooh - '93 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 46.86 mpg (US)

Truckwez - '04 Dakota SLT
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
It seems like the wheels of the VW are even closer to the corners and even with that, I've never heard of someone rolling a Metro...
lol

Metro roll over contest
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/how-narrow-too-narrow-thinking-plan-view-10883.html
Posted By For Type Date
EcoModder.com Latest Blog Posts This thread Refback 11-11-2009 09:48 PM
How narrow is too narrow? Thinking in plan view. - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com This thread Refback 11-06-2009 12:02 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY: Side View Mirror Delete, Side View Camera Addition SVOboy DIY / How-to 19 05-05-2009 03:29 PM
plan view of Impact/EV-1 aerohead Aerodynamics 1 07-24-2008 06:41 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com