Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2009, 09:08 PM   #21 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,124

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 198 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Variable pressure = something more to go wrong, waste fuel, and weigh more.
True but... I'd rather have variable tire pressure than A/C or Bluetooth, or an automatic, or an ICE, or 8 way electric adjust seats, or cruise control...

OK, I thought about it for longer than an nanosecond... it's a silly idea. Need lower pressure, Get out and let some air out.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 09:10 PM   #22 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange4boy View Post
True but... I'd rather have variable tire pressure than A/C or Bluetooth, or an automatic, or an ICE, or 8 way electric adjust seats, or cruise control...
There's no "I'd rather have" in the marketing scheme of the publicly traded auto manufacturers... only "Here's what you need, here's how much more you're going to pay for it."
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
CoastRider (12-16-2009), Piwoslaw (12-15-2009)
Old 12-14-2009, 09:14 PM   #23 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,124

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 198 Times in 110 Posts
I know. *sigh* I'm just living in my little dream world here...Ya gotta have dreams.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to orange4boy For This Useful Post:
Christ (12-14-2009)
Old 12-14-2009, 09:24 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
"Here's what you need, here's how much more you're going to pay for it."
There's why your market share is down another couple of percentage points this year :-)

You know, I just realized something: 1) US automakers' market share is down to about 50%; 2) By definition, half the population has below-average intelligence. You suppose there's a connection :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 10:39 PM   #25 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,124

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 198 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
You know, I just realized something: 1) US automakers' market share is down to about 50%; 2) By definition, half the population has below-average intelligence. You suppose there's a connection :-)
Have a similar theory about political affiliation but I'm too smart to elaborate.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 11:37 PM   #26 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange4boy View Post
Have a similar theory about political affiliation but I'm too smart to elaborate.
...ah, a member of the Astute Party?
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 11:42 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Did someone just take high school physics? Yes the contact patch affects grip, because the rubber and the road aren't two perfectly smooth surfaces. The rubber conforms to the bumps in the pavement, and the more bumps the more grip.

If bigger contact patch = same grip, why do lawyers love staggered tire sizes?

http://www.modified.com/projectcars/...t_2/index.html

Last edited by winkosmosis; 12-14-2009 at 11:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 12:23 AM   #28 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 51 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
Did someone just take high school physics? Yes the contact patch affects grip, because the rubber and the road aren't two perfectly smooth surfaces. The rubber conforms to the bumps in the pavement, and the more bumps the more grip.
Perhaps someone should take high school physics. More bumps do not equal more grip. If this were so, drag racers, NASCAR racers, IRL racers, Formula 1 racers, etc., would want bumpy race surfaces. The very opposite is true. They put smooth grippy tires on smooth track surfaces. The reason street tires are not smooth like race tires, is that they have to be able to displace water.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 12:40 AM   #29 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Pretty sure the "bumps" are teensy, at which point the rubber displaces around them, causing "traction". Ice is smooth, nope we don't want that.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 03:51 AM   #30 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,124

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 198 Times in 110 Posts
All of these thing depend upon the rubber formulation, temperature, speed, application, road surface. Here I am talking about passenger tires on asphalt / concrete in normal driving conditions.

My intention is to find and present specific information regarding the relationship between traction and inflation pressure. Whenever this is discussed some people express extreme reserve at inflating to max sidewall and hysteria at inflating somewhat past max sidewall claiming all kinds of calamity and no proof of it. I think these people are misinformed. The AutoSpeed article is interesting, if incomplete, but generally sound, and gave me somewhere to start learning more. The study I posted shows a small reduction in braking distance between low and max sidewall.

My personal opinion on this, at this time, is that up to a point, and generally speaking, higher inflation pressure gives better FE (undisputed) and gives better or the same traction (unknown but suspected) up to and a bit above max sidewall to a point I don't know what that point is but I have a hunch it's somewhere around the point at which 90% of the reduction rolling resistance from slightly higher inflation has been achieved. This is not an extreme pressure. If I had tires that were sold as low RR, I might even just leave them at max sidewall but really, I would only run lower pressures if ride were my priority. Otherwise all other safety/traction,handling issues are better at max sidewall.

One of the biggest and most common dangers is actually underinflation which can lead to blowouts from temperature build up. Higher inflation pressures (not extreme pressures) reduce the possibility of blow out by reducing heat build up.

It is not my intention to give advise, just present information I have found and my opinion on it. My opinion is based on what I have read and some of it is extrapolated from that information. I am willing to change my opinion if I find credible evidence.


From what I have found so far, max sidewall reduces...
1) risk of rollover
2) failure from overheating*
3) stopping distances
4) hydroplaning
5) slipping in snow* (depending on conditions, sometimes lower is better)
6) body lean in cornering

* edited to increase clarity

The only disadvantage to max sidewall I can think of is ride quality.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 

Last edited by orange4boy; 12-15-2009 at 02:25 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to orange4boy For This Useful Post:
Christ (12-15-2009)
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
contact patch, inflation, max sidewall, tires, traction

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Autospeed article: adding a chin undertray to a 1st gen Prius MetroMPG Aerodynamics 18 08-11-2011 04:18 AM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 68 02-21-2010 08:45 PM
Autospeed article about VW's 1L car MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 8 02-06-2010 01:51 PM
AutoSpeed Article: Low Drag Car Aerodynamics TestDrive Aerodynamics 3 03-10-2009 10:50 AM
Autospeed mag aero testing article saabite Aerodynamics 2 01-21-2009 12:16 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com